partytracker.uk — a sourced record of what Britain's political parties say and do, party by party, with every entry linked to a primary source

Showing every spoken contribution, including 11,987 under 12 words. Hide short remarks

1. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Reform·Andrew Rosindell

   Government Borrowing: Economic Impact

   Does the Minister understand just how devastating the effects of his Government’s spending, taxing and borrowing policies are for my constituents in Romford? Does he recall that the last time we had a Prime Minister who understood that we need low taxes, a smaller state and lower borrowing was in 1990? Then the national debt was 21% of GDP; now it is heading for 100%. Will he please reduce the size of the state, cut taxes for hard-working people and start to live within our means?

   Hansard source
2. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Plaid Cymru·Llinos Medi

   Advanced Manufacturing

   Around 5,000 people in my constituency work in the hospitality sector, which is a vital part of the Welsh economy. While hospitality businesses across much of the European Union benefit from reduced VAT rates, our pubs, hotels and restaurants are stuck paying 20%. Why did the Chancellor decide not to prioritise that sector in last week’s Budget?

   Hansard source
3. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Plaid Cymru·Ann Davies

   Young People and Work: Milburn Interim Report

   Diolch yn fawr, Gadeirydd. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship. Let me start by saying that I do not like the phrase “not in education, employment or training”, or NEET; I much prefer LEET, because most young people are looking for employment, education or training. The NEET phrase makes people feel as if they are not trying hard enough, which could not be further from the truth. Young people are hard-working and passionate, and they want to contribute their skills to the workforce, but our system does not set them up for success. Many have not yet found the opportunities or pathways that allow them the space to figure out and find their niche. Everyone is good at something, but too many young people are not afforded the opportunity to figure out what that may be. The most recent data shows that 14.6% of young people aged 16 to 24 in Wales are not in education, employment or training to the year ending June 2026. That is an unacceptable figure. Nearly one sixth of our talented young people in Wales have not been given the opportunity to thrive and find their place. One thing that stood out to me from Milburn’s interim report was the impact on place of the levels of young people not in education, employment or training. In rural Wales, barriers to obtaining a driving licence or having access to a car makes that a very visible problem. Young people facing financial constraints are more likely to struggle as a result of those barriers. If we are serious about widening opportunity, tackling child poverty must be a priority. With that in mind, can the Minister confirm whether the Welsh Cynnal payment will be disregarded for benefit purposes? I have met so many fabulous young people since becoming the Member of Parliament for Caerfyrddin, and I am really proud to be their MP. Minister, what steps are the Government taking to ensure that every young person, no matter their postcode or financial background, has the same chance to succeed?

   Hansard source
4. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Wera Hobhouse

   Budget Resolutions

   Can the right hon. and learned Lady remind us of what her Government did, and what she did when she was in government, to increase apprenticeships?

   Hansard source
5. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Wera Hobhouse

   Budget Resolutions

   I would like to address the barriers that businesses are facing right now that make them not so hopeful about the future. The south-west is home to many innovative businesses that employ local people and generate growth across the region, such as Drift Energy and Luthmore. Based in Bath, Drift Energy is developing a first-of-its-kind sailing vessel that harvests wind energy on the move. This groundbreaking innovator would reduce UK reliance on imported fossil fuels, increase domestic green hydrogen capacity and open new manufacturing and maritime innovation opportunities. CBI Economics has estimated that by 2032, Drift Energy could deliver nearly £200 million in growth through operations in the south-west alone. Luthmore is a south-west business that has developed a first-of-its-kind battery-enabled alternative to the gas combi boiler. It currently employs 42 people—a figure that is forecast to double to 80 within the next nine months, making it a significant local employer. With the right support and conditions, these businesses could generate real growth in postcodes across the south-west. The Government say that they will cut business costs and support innovation, but the measures in this Budget do not go anywhere near far enough in addressing the financial challenges that these businesses face. The Budget fails to address a significant funding gap—the gap between the points at which seed investment funds and venture funds respectively feel comfortable enough to begin investing in a business. As the financial markets continue to suffer, the risk appetite of venture funds decreases, which means that companies must reach a significantly greater maturity before they can be funded from these sources. The innovation loan and grant schemes, which have been separated into regional districts, and agencies such as the clean growth fund were meant to plug that this gap, but they are now approaching investments in a similar vein to commercial venture capital: they are looking for greater and greater reduction of risk. That forces innovative businesses that develop first-of-its-kind technology to seek funds from international sources, often with a requirement for operations to be moved away from the original region. These businesses want to employ local people, but the Budget does not address the failure of Government policy to support businesses to mass-manufacture in Britain. There are no local incentives that would reduce costs and enable them to compete with international manufacturers. British businesses moving abroad is not good growth in every postcode. The Budget leaves the future uncertain for those businesses, making it harder to employ local people, harder to trade with local businesses, and easier to move abroad and ultimately prevent the growth that we all want. I also want to address, very briefly, the unwelcome and short-sighted cuts in the warm homes plan and the boiler upgrade scheme. This decision is of profound concern in respect of not only our climate commitments but the basic health, security and wellbeing of many households across the country. As fossil fuel prices surge, the boiler upgrade scheme is cutting bills for people across the country, employing thousands, and improving the resilience of homes by breaking the link with oil and gas. The boiler upgrade scheme is more than a grant to help households; it is creating a UK industry that can deliver cheaper heating, skilled jobs, greater energy independence—and, yes, growth. I urge the Government to reverse this disastrous decision and immediately restore full funding to our warm home commitments. We all want growth. I have drawn attention to a few things that make growth very difficult for businesses across the south-west and across the country, and I hope that the Government will consider them.

   Hansard source
6. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Wera Hobhouse

   Budget Resolutions

   Given that the Minister has just said that the Government want to support households but also move away from expensive fossil fuels, why make cuts to the boiler upgrade scheme and the warm homes plan?

   Hansard source
7. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Victoria Collins

   Budget Resolutions

   Britain needed a much bolder Budget for growth—one for families and businesses, and to boost our economy. For families, heating—or even cooling—our homes, getting around and feeding the family are all costs that continue to rise. The energy price cap is set to rise again in January, and 1.4 million low-income households in higher council tax bands will miss out under this Budget. However, our Lib Dem essential energy guarantee would take £100 off the average bill for everyone, paid for by clawing back excess profits made by monopoly energy operators. We would also cut rail fares by 10%, bus fares to £1 and fuel duty by 10p, paid for by the Treasury’s fuel price windfall. For most businesses, rent, rates, energy and hiring costs are going up. At DJ’s Play Zone in my local area, Mark says that his rates bill has gone up by 52%, from £21,000 to £32,000 a year, on top of the national insurance jobs tax and rising wages. He is running a small business in a big building, so small business relief never reaches him. The Chancellor’s new £18,000 threshold changes nothing for him and many other businesses that slip under the net.

   Hansard source
8. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Victoria Collins

   Budget Resolutions

   Absolutely. That is why we need wholesale reform, looking at how we are supporting the businesses that need it and at the broken business rates system. Charlotte from Berkhamsted Bookshop tells me that the average independent bookshop will need to sell over 1,000 more books a year just to cover rising costs. Christopher, who runs a small martial arts academy in Tring, tells me that rising rent and service charges threaten his future, with almost no protection for small commercial tenants. Liberal Democrats have repeatedly called for more to be done to help our local businesses, including replacing business rates with a commercial landowner levy and cutting VAT on hospitality by 5p.

   Hansard source
9. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Victoria Collins

   Budget Resolutions

   I could not have put it better myself. On top of that there is the cost of hiring, as has been mentioned again and again. The Government have to tackle that for businesses. If we truly want fresh hope for the future and for our wider economy, we need bold action. Supporting our entrepreneurs is key, and as Lib Dems who have pushed for a type of young entrepreneurs allowance for almost a decade, we are pleased to see that proposal and look forward to hearing more details. I would also push the Government to look at further work to support start-ups and scale-ups, including reviewing the seed enterprise investment scheme, tax on SEIS, tax credits and relief so that they work for businesses. As for the founders’ relief, I ask the Government to work with the industry to ensure that it works. One founder said to me that they felt that if they stood on one leg and turned around enough times they might just about get close to getting some of it. On incentivising innovation, the Government must take spin-outs from our world-leading universities across the UK more seriously. We are calling for the Government to quintuple proof-of-concept funding, create regional innovation centres and introduce standardised frameworks for negotiating intellectual property across the sector. As regards innovative spending, the extra £120 million for the Sovereign AI fund pales in comparison to the nearly £8 billion of active contracts with US tech giants or the billions spent on procurement. We call for a proper digital sovereign strategy to back our British businesses and to look at increasing research and development spending, so that we do not have to make decisions over Jodrell Bank, for example, and how that is impacting innovation. Finally, we need a bold plan on Europe. We are calling for a growth and defence partnership with Europe, rejoining the single market and customs union. Not only can we cut taxes for families with that growth dividend, but inject real growth into our economy for families, businesses and our future.

   Hansard source
10. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Tessa Munt

    Community Transport Services: Minibus Drivers

    I am a massive supporter of Mendip Community Transport. In fact, my village has a community transport minibus, which is an absolutely essential lifeline, particularly in such a rural area where we have no buses. What does my hon. Friend think about the fact that if someone wants to undertake a minibus driving test in my area, they must travel some long distance and the test can cost up to £2,000, which seems extraordinarily expensive?

    Hansard source
11. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Tessa Munt

    Community Transport Services: Minibus Drivers

    I thank my hon. Friend for giving way for a second time. I would like to point out that a number of community minibuses are electric vehicles, and their batteries make them very much heavier, which, along with accessibility equipment such as wheelchair lifts, automatically take their weight way over the 3.5 tonne limit.

    Hansard source
12. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Steve Darling

    Young People and Work: Milburn Interim Report

    UKHospitality highlights that over 100,000 jobs have been lost in the hospitality sector, particularly in areas such as Torbay where hospitality can be the first rung of employment. Does my hon. Friend agree that we are seeing a crisis of opportunity for young people, rather than a NEET crisis?

    Hansard source
13. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Steve Darling

    Train Services: Extreme Weather

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Jardine. I congratulate the hon. Member for Cannock Chase (Josh Newbury) on landing this really important debate. Climate change is the real enemy we are facing, whether in the form of extreme heat or storms. Twelve years ago, the storm at Dawlish ripped away the sea wall, leaving it looking almost like a railway line somewhere in South America after a big storm. It resulted in eight weeks of closure down to the south-west of England—eight weeks that massively impacted us. One estimate suggested that the economic impact was around £1.2 billion. I remember getting on trains at Paddington that were usually busy but felt more like the Mary Celeste. It was incredible. There were five parts to the puzzle of sorting the rail line out, as part of the south-west resilience programme. The fifth and final part remains outstanding, which is extremely worrying. Most of us enjoyed the really good summer we just had—some of us endured it—but the other side of the coin is much wetter winters, which could massively impact the cliffs at Dawlish. The cliffs are the enemy now, rather than the sea, as they could collapse. Work on that is unfunded, and we desperately need the funding. I hope the Minister will reflect on that in his comments. Further up the line from Dawlish is Powderham, often a place for events. The challenge there concerns the Environment Agency’s choice of a managed retreat from Dawlish Warren, such that the warren, which currently acts as a protector to the estuary, could break and open up the railway line at Powderham to attack by storms and the sea. We need investment to protect that rail line, after we have achieved the success at Dawlish that we are hoping for from the Minister. I want to reflect on where we are with the heat. In Devon and Cornwall, we have really poor-quality local rolling stock, which is almost life-expired. The perverse thing is that although they are new to us, the trains are third or fourth hand-me-downs from elsewhere in the country. The class 175s were handed down from south Wales, and they have not quite been got running, so even the hand-me-downs do not work. In the north of England, there has been investment in quality rail solutions for the trans-Pennine railways—partly electrification and partly battery. We should have a similarly futuristic rail service for Devon and Cornwall, which would not only be a lot more sustainable in our changing world, but would ensure that we tackle climate change by taking the carbon out of travel on our railway. A specific challenge facing trains in the south-west is the lack of moisture in the soil, which means that they have to travel particularly slowly. We need to be alive to that issue, as well as to buckling rails. I speak to hoteliers such as the owner of the Berburry hotel, which is quite close to Torquay rail station. She gets international visitors, whose experience on the continent, sadly, is often of a much better-quality rail service. After decades of under-investment, we really need that investment. I look forward to the Minister’s reflections on the fifth and final piece of the Dawlish puzzle, on how we protect Powderham in the light of the threat I highlighted, and on investment in quality rolling stock for Devon and Cornwall, so that we can face the future with confidence.

    Hansard source
14. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Steve Darling

    Train Services: Extreme Weather

    A few months ago, Network Rail met me and other south-west MPs who are here today and told us that it is occasionally acceptable to close the Dawlish rail line. Does the Minister believe that it is acceptable?

    Hansard source
15. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Steff Aquarone

    Budget Resolutions

    I refer the House to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests, as a former county councillor. It is safe to say that I have not been inundated with emails praising this Budget or crediting it for tackling the thorny issues that my constituents face. Those eligible will welcome the £100 energy bill payment going towards their soaring bills, but the more than 10,000 of my constituents reliant on heating oil will wonder where they are going to find the rest of what has often been a £500 price hike on their oil bills. They will also be asking why the Government have cut VAT for those who rely solely on electricity but are happy to rake in double the VAT receipts from others who face those soaring bills. Removing VAT on those bills would put another £50 back in the pockets of those who have to fill a 1,000 litre tank. The Government are benefiting from a VAT windfall, and it is time that they gave that back to the people suffering from these higher costs. Rural communities in general are struggling as a result of this Budget. In particular, schools are close to their crisis point in too many villages in North Norfolk. Earlier this year, Corpusty primary shut its school gates for the last time. It was heartbreaking for the families affected, and for the children, who were losing the only school that most of them had ever known. We fought tooth and nail against that closure—unlike, I should say, either the Conservative or Reform administrations at County Hall, who stood idly by. I warned anyone who would listen that Corpusty was the canary in the coalmine. Its fundamental challenges were not unique, and it was an indicator of a worrying trend that needs to change. I am deeply fearful of what comes next, because more school leaders and parents are telling me their concerns about their local schools. For all their best efforts, headteachers just cannot make the books balance. It is not their fault; they are being failed by a funding formula that simply does not appreciate the realities of rural life and the importance of rural schools to their communities. In places where there is a fall in the number of children and young people, schools are crying out for a funding package that can help them stay afloat and adapt to a difficult financial and demographic environment. They should feel reassured by the falling rolls funding mechanism, which triggers a £140,000 payout to local authorities through the dedicated schools grant whenever there is a drop of 10%, year on year, in an area’s pupil census. Despite that drop being the reason why that money is coming forward, there is no requirement for it to be spent on those schools, or the issue of falling rolls. It is clear that both sides need to change their processes. The Government need to be more prescriptive about ringfencing, and I will argue that it is not an outlandish ask for falling rolls funding to be dedicated to falling rolls. On their side, the local authority cannot just use this as another sticking plaster to cover educational funding crises. If we do not get a grip on the schools crisis, we face challenging times in our rural communities. If we lose the schools, we lose the working-age population. If we do not fund rural schools properly, whole communities suffer. If there is no local school, the area is not a viable place for a young family to live. That means no one of working age to do the inherently rural jobs in farming, or in the energy industry or defence. In a community without working-age people, there is no one to staff the doctor’s surgery, provide care or even pour a cup of coffee on a Monday morning. We must act now if we want our cherished rural and coastal communities to flourish, and if there is to be good growth in every postcode, there must be cross-governmental support for small rural schools. The Government’s goals—not just for education and economic growth, but for transport, housing, climate change, food security and even defence—all depend on a vibrant future for our rural communities, yet this Budget’s measures are just another example of the Government working in silos, which is not working for our rural areas. It is time to re-establish hope for rural communities by backing small schools.

    Hansard source
16. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Sarah Olney

    Advanced Manufacturing

    The Treasury Committee’s recent report on student loan repayments said that the Government have a “moral obligation” to reverse their decision to freeze the threshold at which student loans are repaid. Will the Chancellor set out his timeline for when he will end the repayment threshold freeze?

    Hansard source
17. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Sarah Olney

    Poundland

    The news about Poundland will be deeply worrying for its 12,000 staff members and their families, for the 30,000 staff overall when we include the supply chain—as the Chair of the Select Committee has said—and for the communities in which its stores are located. As Poundland’s founder, Steve Smith, has said: “Once these jobs are lost, they are lost”. For many families, Poundland is one of the few affordable options left. People are already struggling with an unsustainably high cost of living, and they now face losing somewhere that they rely on to make their money go further. The fall of Poundland raises bigger questions about our high streets. Its troubles show how much pressure both shoppers and high street businesses are under. The Prime Minister has set out his ambition to revive the high street, but the collapse of one of the UK’s most well-known and affordable retailers highlights the extent to which our high streets are struggling. The business rates system puts our high street shops at an unfair disadvantage compared with online retail giants, and the national insurance hike imposed by this Government is unfair and counterproductive. With unemployment levels already alarmingly high, will the Minister now listen to the Liberal Democrats’ calls to properly overhaul the broken business rates system and scrap the unfair jobs tax—at the very least, for part-time workers?

    Hansard source
18. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Sarah Dyke

    Child Trust Funds

    As a YMCA parliamentary patron, I visited the YMCA’s home in Glastonbury, which works alongside Street Foyer to support young people, including care leavers. Many care leavers had child trust funds opened by the state but have no parent or guardian to tell them that the money exists. They need it the most. What is the Minister doing to ensure that every care leaver receives the savings that are rightfully theirs?

    Hansard source
19. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Richard Foord

    Train Services: Extreme Weather

    It is good to see you in the Chair, Ms Jardine. I congratulate the hon. Member for Cannock Chase (Josh Newbury) on securing this debate. It is one that I have tried to secure on a number of occasions, because the west of England line runs through my constituency, passing through the towns of Axminster, Honiton and Feniton. I was struck a moment ago by my hon. Friend the Member for Chichester (Jess Brown-Fuller) describing how extreme weather has become, simply, weather. That was very well put. In this debate, we could talk about not extreme weather but the impact of climate change on our transport infrastructure. It is good to see the Minister for Local Transport in his place, because he has been fantastic at securing new railway stations for mid-Devon and Somerset at Cullompton and Wellington, respectively. He does an excellent job in his role, and that is why I am pleased to have the opportunity to talk about Liberal Democrat policy as well as the west of England line. The line connects Exeter with London Waterloo and goes via Salisbury. Much of that line, certainly west of Salisbury, is single track. When there is a disruption or delay, that means that the whole timetable gets thrown. Understandably, a lot of residents in east Devon have contacted me about that in the dry hot summers that we have had in the last two years. South Western Railway describes the main consequences of that dry weather as “soil moisture deficit”, which is a euphemism for embankments that are dry. That is largely due to the route sitting on clay. When prolonged heat and drought remove moisture from the soil, the clay shrinks, the embankments move and the track moves, too. In those conditions, it would be dangerous to carry on as normal. Speed restrictions have to be imposed. We saw the consequences of extreme weather on a railway line that does not have any disruption to the schedule in Lewes earlier this year, when a Southern train derailed. The problem in that case was “track geometry irregularity”, which I think is a euphemism for rails that have bent. In seriousness, I accept that safety has to come first. But we have to acknowledge that while safety is a priority, it is having severe consequences on the people we represent. I want to consider young people who are trying to build their futures. One person from Awliscombe wrote to me to say that his 17-year-old daughter could no longer get to her apprenticeship for 8 o’clock in the morning, because the only train reaching Exeter at that time had been cancelled. Without any replacement bus service, he and his wife are having to make a 40-mile round trip by car to get their daughter to work. That is not an isolated incident: roughly 550 college students travel on the west of England line to Exeter college. A father from Offwell told me that his daughter, who has just started, is subjected to train cancellations and delays, and often spends two to three hours every day waiting for a train home from Exeter. A mother from Honiton explained how, since both the 7.30 am train and 7.45 am bus have been cancelled, there is no way for students to arrive on time for their 9.45 lectures. Students are relying on the service to access their further education, but it is also affecting working people. Shelby Gittens is a dental hygienist from All Saints near Axminster. She has been prevented from reaching Exeter reliably before the start of her working day. Due to the delays, her office has had to reschedule her 9 o’clock patients indefinitely until the matter is resolved. Given that Devon is one of the UK’s foremost dental deserts, that is quite a serious consequence for people trying to get dental work in Devon.

    Hansard source
20. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Richard Foord

    Train Services: Extreme Weather

    My hon. Friend makes a good point. Time is not wasted on a delayed train if there is a good wi-fi connection for the workers onboard, so I recommend that investment in the main line. On the west of England line, which is the poor relation to Great Western, I have heard from constituents who have been trying to get to colleges, schools and businesses, and from patients and families, about the effect it is having on the local economy. Those disruptions often hit the most vulnerable in our society the hardest. Kathryn Wilkerson from Sidmouth told me that over the course of six journeys to London for work that she made in the summer heat, only one featured working air conditioning. She explained that on multiple occasions when she was on packed trains, she had to pause her journey and get off the train due to dizziness and to avoid fainting from heat exhaustion. Kathryn pointed out that this means that train travel in the heat can be dangerous, and that the rolling stock needs to be updated to adapt to the climate change that we all see. Students, workers and the vulnerable all tell the same story. People I represent are right to ask why a line of such importance for the network as a whole remains so vulnerable. People can accept that temporary measures may be required because of soil moisture deficit, but this is no longer a temporary measure—it is the second year in a row that a schedule has been introduced for months at a time meaning that trains are only running once every two hours. Weather-related delays across the country have cost around £370 million over three years from 2023-24, but that is just the narrow economic consequence on the railways, not the wider consequences for all those people whose anecdotes I have described. The Liberal Democrats believe that passengers deserve railways that withstand the climate conditions that we are set to face. Too much of our infrastructure, particularly in the west country, still relies on Victorian earthworks and drainage systems and assets that were not designed for today’s climate—and of course they have been subject to the Beeching cuts. Instead of bringing those facilities into the 21st century, the last Conservative Government left behind a legacy of underinvestment and crumbling infrastructure. I have corresponded with Ministers in the Department for Transport, not least with Lord Hendy in the other place, about the west of England line. The specific thing that I have sought from Ministers is investment into passing loops on the line. To make an analogy with the road, passing loops are like pulling over to allow an oncoming vehicle to come the other way. I understand from Lord Hendy that if we were to make the case for investment in passing loops in control period 8—the period of 2029 to 2034—we could potentially see them developed at Tisbury, Feniton, Whimple and other places on the west of England line, to enable trains to pull over and to run on a more frequent basis, even when experiencing soil moisture deficit. What further can the Minister recommend that we do to secure those passing loops in control period 8? More generally, how will the Government accelerate investment in climate resilience so that we can get ahead of the changes we know are coming down the track and make sure that our students, workers and most vulnerable members of society get the transport links they deserve?

    Hansard source
21. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Rachel Gilmour

    High Streets and Town Centres

    While the Budget provides some welcome support for high streets, so many businesses in Tiverton and Minehead tell me that excessive costs, regulation and red tape remain a drag on growth. Does the Minister agree that lasting economic growth will require not just short-term support but fundamental reform of business rates and tax administration so that businesses can invest, expand and create jobs with confidence?

    Hansard source
22. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Rachel Gilmour

    Budget Resolutions

    I am delighted to hear that the hon. Gentleman, a medical professional, recognises the importance of primary care. We spend a fraction of what the NHS spends on chronic care on primary care. Just last night, I hosted a reception for the Independent Pharmacies Association, which I know will be grateful for his words.

    Hansard source
23. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Mr Will Forster

    Train Services: Extreme Weather

    I thank the hon. Member for introducing this debate. Like him, I have surveyed my commuting constituents; as a result, I regularly complain about the unreliability of South Western Railway. It is particularly unreliable whenever there is hot or cold weather. Does he agree that the Government should deliver an investment plan to improve our railway network so that it can adapt to climate change, including by introducing air conditioning on all train services?

    Hansard source
24. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Mr Will Forster

    Cost of Living

    <Question HRSContentId="{09C974A0-6A4E-4705-8F95-5F4856E9B507}">10. <QuestionText HRSContentId="{B510A919-AC5B-4BCF-9F5F-1390265B0A9B}">What steps he has taken to help reduce the cost of living. </QuestionText></Question>

    Hansard source
25. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Mr Will Forster

    Cost of Living

    Yesterday, Trussell and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation wrote to the Prime Minister criticising the Government for freezing local housing allowance, saying that it will not help people with the cost of living and will critically undermine plans to end rough sleeping. Does the Chancellor agree with those national charities and Citizens Advice in my Woking constituency that rent support must be tied to actual rent levels?

    Hansard source
26. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Martin Wrigley

    Budget Resolutions

    Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

    Hansard source
27. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Martin Wrigley

    Budget Resolutions

    The hon. Gentleman cherishes the NHS; does he agree that the single patient record, of which he speaks so eloquently, must be delivered by sovereign British technology?

    Hansard source
28. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Marie Goldman

    Equality Act 2010 Guidance: Gynaecological Conditions

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Ms Jardine. I, too, congratulate the hon. Member for Hampstead and Highgate (Tulip Siddiq) on securing this really important debate. I would also like to join other Members from across the House in congratulating and commending the campaigners, some of whom are in the Gallery, on the incredible work that they do on behalf of not just themselves but all women across the country and, indeed, internationally. Millions of women face the difficulty and pain of managing gynaecological conditions such as endometriosis, adenomyosis, fibroids, PMDD—the list goes on and on. It is obvious that more must be done to rapidly speed up diagnosis times and provide effective care and accommodations to those with these often incredibly debilitating conditions. Their impacts on women’s everyday lives extend, as we have heard, to education, employment and fertility. Some women leave work altogether because they cannot obtain the support that they need. We cannot—indeed, must not—accept that as normal. My Liberal Democrat colleagues and I believe that there would be merit in dealing with these conditions in the same way as cancer, HIV and multiple sclerosis, which are deemed to be disabilities, under the Equality Act 2010, from the point of diagnosis and without the need to meet the functional test. I therefore urge the Government to examine that proposal further. As we have heard, however, even getting a diagnosis is appallingly slow. Women’s symptoms are too often normalised or dismissed across all health conditions. I have heard outrageous stories of women’s persistent health concerns being dismissed with sometimes incredibly sexist comments attached. One young woman described to me fairly recently a particularly awful example. She was explaining to a consultant how she felt physically sick because of her persistent stomach pain, in this case while she was out shopping with friends, only to be dismissed by the doctor, who replied, “I often feel sick when I go shopping with my wife”—[Interruption.] There are groans from the Gallery. That actually happened. With there being grossly outdated and misplaced attitudes like this, it is hardly surprising that it takes an average of almost 10 years to receive an endometriosis diagnosis in the UK. Recent research by Endometriosis UK has shone a light on the extent of the impact of this condition. In a recent report, the charity found that 97% of those surveyed worked while experiencing severe pain. It is no wonder that almost half of all those with endometriosis said that it had made it difficult to progress in their career, while 28% had had to leave their job altogether because of it. The same survey found that employers overwhelmingly want to help, but with there being little guidance and with employers facing the everyday pressures of running a business, the support for these women often just is not there. That is costing women—in pain, in missed career opportunities and, ultimately, in dignity. My Liberal Democrat colleagues and I have written to Baroness Merron, the Women’s Health Minister, on several occasions to raise the urgent need to improve care for women with gynaecological conditions. The Government know that health-related economic inactivity costs the UK £212 billion every year. Even if we think about this only in such crude economic terms, the action needed pays for itself. Indeed, one NHS Confederation report found that for every £1 spent on obstetrics and gynaecology, the estimated return on investment was £11. It follows that tackling NHS waiting times for gynaecological services should be a top priority. That is why it was so disappointing that the women’s health strategy contained no specific, measurable, time-bound target to reduce the backlogs in endometriosis care, while the NHS 10-year health plan did not include endometriosis, adenomyosis, PMOS or fibroids in its prevention agenda. Without there being clear direction from Government, we risk consigning more women to even longer waits and prolonged, unnecessary pain. That is why I was proud that the Liberal Democrats tabled to the Health Bill a new clause that would have ensured that the average wait time for endometriosis and other women-specific conditions was no longer than the average wait time for other elective conditions in the NHS. That would be a meaningful step towards equality in women’s healthcare. Finally, we know that what gets measured gets done in the NHS. I hope that the Minister takes this away and conducts a serious examination of adding gynaecological conditions to the Equality Act 2010 guidance. We owe it to these women to do all we can to tackle this injustice.

    Hansard source
29. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Liz Jarvis

    Budget Resolutions

    Last Wednesday my constituents in Eastleigh looked to the Chancellor for real help with the cost of living. While some of the measures that he announced are welcome, I am afraid that this Budget lacks ambition, and is short term and poorly targeted. According to the Resolution Foundation, the one-off household energy payment based on council tax band rather than need means that 1.4 million low-income households in higher bands will miss out, while the scrapping of gas standing charges will save the typical household just £1.83 a month. The cuts to VAT on electricity and fuel duty both end next July, long before the OBR expects pressure on family budgets to ease. For constituents like Susan, a widow who lives in a park home in Fair Oak, the Budget offered very little. She is off the main gas grid and has no choice but to heat her home with liquid petroleum gas, which is far more expensive and is not protected by the energy price cap. Her £100 payment will barely touch the sides, and scrapping standing charges does nothing for her. Will the Minister set out what support the Government will provide for off-grid households like Susan’s, who rely on liquid petroleum gas and are not protected by the energy price cap? The Chancellor’s decision to raise the threshold for small business rates relief from £12,000 to £18,000 is welcome. However, the policy does not live up to the headline, benefiting only a limited number of businesses in Eastleigh. On Thursday, I hosted a post-Budget business breakfast in my constituency. Lucy, who runs Telmar CNC, a precision engineering firm in Chandler’s Ford, told me that her rates bill has doubled in six years, and manufacturers like her business got nothing. Jane runs Elite Hair Salon, which, as a microbusiness, is too small for the changes to make any difference. She told me, “Overall, this Budget has done little to support my business or many others within the hair and beauty sector.” I welcome the extra small producer relief. However, raising alcohol duty yet again in February will hit the very pubs and drinkers that small brewers depend on, and that is why we oppose it. We are approaching Remembrance Sunday; and, in the current climate, ensuring that our armed forces are properly equipped is more urgent than ever. In Eastleigh, Stuart, who runs GW Martin &amp; Co, has welcomed the Government’s commitment to small firms in the defence investment plan, but he told me, “We would like to see greater urgency in funding this necessary investment as we have capacity and capability to respond quickly, which will create jobs, growth and revenue.” Instead, the plan to reach 3% of GDP on defence has been pushed back to next year’s spending review. James, who owns JLMS—an apprenticeship provider—told me, “This was not a Budget for youth employment.” The payment for taking on an apprentice has not gone up in five years, while the cost of employing and training a young person keeps rising. The Chancellor had a choice. He could have reversed the increase to employer national insurance contributions, which has sent job vacancies to a five-year low. Instead, he told young people to wait for another review. On plan 2 student loans, this Budget was again silent. It was an opportunity to reverse last autumn’s deeply unfair decision to freeze the repayment threshold from April 2027 for three years. With the minimum wage rising and the threshold frozen, we are approaching the point where a graduate on the minimum wage could have to start repaying. I urge the Treasury to scrap the freeze and link the threshold to average earnings. I am pleased that the Chancellor has finally listened to Lib Dem calls to scrap the carer’s allowance cliff edge. That is a welcome first step, but it will not come into force until 2030, and carers trying to balance work with looking after a loved one need this safety net now, not in four years. Will the Minister commit to bringing forward its introduction so that carers do not have to wait until 2030? Eastleigh needed a Budget with real ambition, but this one falls short. I urge the Chancellor to go further.

    Hansard source
30. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Layla Moran

    Budget Resolutions

    I am extremely grateful to my hon. Friend for giving way, and I am so pleased he is back on his feet. He is making a really important point about a potential blind spot for the Government in terms of rurality. Policy Exchange produced an excellent report recently about the effect of rurality on access to healthcare in England. Does he agree that if we design services around the hardest to reach, that helps the most unequal parts of society everywhere?

    Hansard source
31. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·John Milne

    Young People and Work: Milburn Interim Report

    The first instalment of the Milburn review has been well received on both sides of the House. As a member of the Work and Pensions Committee, I had the chance to ask Alan Milburn about it a few months ago. One of the things he said, which got a lot of press but has been misunderstood, is that we spend £25 on benefits for every £1 we spend on helping young people into work. Contrary to what some on the right have assumed, that emphatically does not mean that slashing benefits is the way to cure youth unemployment. For years under the Conservatives, jobcentres operated under a sanctions-based culture. That failed. Job hunting is difficult, and totally demoralising job hunters by distrusting their every move is not the way to coach them through their first interviews. In evidence to the Committee, young people described being made to feel like a “leech”. How does that help anyone? The demand for people to demonstrate that they have submitted large numbers of job applications like notches on a belt has been completely destructive. Local employers have disengaged in my constituency because they have been spammed with poorly targeted applications. We should not be so hasty to write off the current generation as a bunch of snowflakes. Rather, we should remember that the current level of nearly 1 million NEETs is less than the peak back in 2011, when we had 1.25 million. The remarkable fact is that 44% of NEETs are not claiming any kind of benefit at all. Surely, even the most zealous right-winger can see that that challenges the cliché of an out-of-control benefits culture. Success stems from intervention at an early age. When kids stop attending school, that is a powerful indicator of their likelihood of becoming NEETs later. In that context, the Government’s youth guarantee scheme will not do the trick. It only kicks in after 18 months of unemployment, when the damage is done. It is also not available to kids on benefits. This will not be a quick fix, but actions today will bring huge long-term rewards for the people who matter most: our children.

    Hansard source
32. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·John Milne

    Child Trust Funds

    This is fantastic news—so many people have campaigned for it over so many years. I thank my colleague Baroness Kramer in the Lords, who helped by tabling an amendment to the Financial Services and Markets Bill that has brought us to this point. Will the Minister join me in paying tribute to my constituent Andrew Turner, who was one of the first parents to discover this issue when his child Mikey reached the age of 18 six years ago and has campaigned tirelessly on it? He has done a fantastic job. Would she like to congratulate him?

    Hansard source
33. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Jess Brown-Fuller

    Train Services: Extreme Weather

    It is interesting listening to the hon. Gentleman’s speech and realising the commonalities that we have, even though our constituencies are so far apart, with mine being located on the south coast of England. A lot of my constituents travel outside the city of Chichester for work; similarly, a lot of people living in Bognor Regis and Portsmouth come into Chichester for work. All these people are encouraged to use public transport, but since extreme weather is rapidly becoming just weather, does he agree that it is incredibly frustrating for people who are constantly being told, “We are sorry for the disruptions, but we are experiencing extreme weather”? On 40 days this year temperatures have reached over 30 degrees. Similarly, leaves on the line can stop trains from running; indeed, the other day swans on the line stopped the trains from running on our arterial railway route. We need to get a grip and ensure that trains can run, so that people can continue to work.

    Hansard source
34. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Jamie Stone

    Budget Resolutions

    As the MP who represents the furthest away constituency in the British mainland, the words “growth in every postcode” interest me hugely. In preparing for my contribution today, I thought perhaps I would talk about the lack of affordable housing or efforts to promote employment opportunities for the young, but I did something last week that made me think. As some colleagues know, my wife is disabled. That is not what I am on my feet to talk about—she is a brave lady, she puts up with it, and it is all great. I thought it would be kind to order her a fireside chair. I found one online at a very good price, reduced, called a jubilee fireside chair, in the colour mineral. It was virtually the first one that came up when I googled “fireside chair for the disabled”, so I clicked on it. There it was, and I thought, “Yes, we’ll have that.” The website said that there was free delivery—great!—and yet, when I came to look more closely at the amount of money, £50 had been added on because of my postcode. I went back to the page, and in very small print, under “Free delivery”, it says, “Perhaps not everywhere”. I can afford that, but lots of people out there cannot afford an extra 50 quid when they want to buy something for somebody they love. In preparing yesterday, I remembered what happened last week, and I thought, “Right, let’s have a little look at the various postcodes.” I worked my way down Scotland. First, I looked at Orkney: delivery costs £50. I looked at Wick: £50. I went down and down and got as far as Perth: £50. So I went east to St Andrews: free delivery. I thought I would then look at Land’s End, in the constituency of my hon. Friend the Member for St Ives (Andrew George): there is a £50 charge for delivery. Then there was a little bit of good news. I looked at the Western Isles, represented by my very good friend the hon. Member for Na h-Eileanan an Iar (Torcuil Crichton). In Stornoway, delivery is free. In Castlebay in Barra, down the bottom of the Outer Hebrides, they can get their fireside chair for the disabled in mineral colour—whatever mineral is; I think it is green—delivered for free. I do not begrudge the hon. Member for Na h-Eileanan an Iar; jolly good luck to him. Out of devilment, I then put in EH99 1SP, the postcode for the Scottish Parliament, and guess what? John Swinney gets it delivered free. My point is that we have these extra charges that we have to pay in the remotest parts of the UK, and it has been going on for years. I spoke in a debate about this issue back in December 2017, when I was first elected to this place, and yet we still have the problem today. It is an iniquitous and completely unfair extra tax on people who really cannot afford to pay it, and it is not in the spirit of fairness one little bit. I have had a good reception from Ministers in the previous Government, but at the end of the day, it was fine words, or, as we say in the highlands, tea and sympathy. I do not expect an instant answer from the Government on this. There are so many demands for things that should be put right, but I would respectfully add these iniquitous extra charges to the list. I would be very, very happy on behalf of all the people who pay these extra charges to sit down with a relevant Minister, outline the problem in detail and help to think of how we can sort it out.

    Hansard source
35. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Jamie Stone

    Budget Resolutions

    I thank my hon. Friend for her intervention. I am not going to string this out any longer. I think I have made my point, which is that if we want growth in every postcode, including some of the remotest parts of the UK, we should tackle this issue of some people having to pay extra charges simply because of where they live, which has a knock-on effect on everything else they buy or do. I rest my case.

    Hansard source
36. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Ian Sollom

    Young People and Work: Milburn Interim Report

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Ms McVey. I congratulate the hon. Member for Wrexham (Andrew Ranger) on securing this debate. Alan Milburn’s interim report is a thorough and, in places, uncomfortable piece of work, but it is an important foundation for anyone serious about tackling the waste of a million young people’s talent, not least because it takes apart some myths. Some 54% of young people who are NEET told the review that they want to work, and another 30% want to get into education or training. These are not lazy young people: as the report puts it, they are “exhausted”. The mechanisms that used to bring young people into work are working less well. The first rung has thinned. The share of 16 and 17-year-old students doing any paid work has fallen from 35% in 2006 to just 19%.

    Hansard source
37. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Ian Sollom

    Young People and Work: Milburn Interim Report

    I agree. Opportunities have been thinning for a long time, and that is a big part of the issue. Employers ask for experience, but the pathways through which experience was once gained have narrowed or gone. The report is blunt about why the system is failing. Britain has not ignored youth employment. It has had the new deal for young people, the future jobs fund, the youth contract and kickstart, but each was abolished once the immediate crisis passed. Milburn describes what we have as “parallel play”: education is accountable for attainment, welfare for benefit flows and health for treatment, but nobody is accountable for the pathway from childhood to working life. The clearest sign of that is what the report calls the “hidden cohort”: about 314,000 NEETs aged 18 to 24 in England, nearly half of whom claim no benefits at all. They are in no caseload, and no institution is responsible for them. The system needs a long-term commitment through a permanent architecture. That is why the Liberal Democrats advocate a wholesale overhaul of jobs coaching so that every young person has a real person who sits down with them several times a year and helps them to plan where they want to get to, building on models from the Netherlands and Germany. Such support has to be delivered locally, because labour markets, transport and employers operate locally. The risk, Milburn warns us, is that without a national framework, devolution can become a delegation of failure. Skills England ought to be part of that national framework, but in its short life it has already been moved from one Department to another, and it remains simply an Executive agency. It needs supercharging; it should become a genuinely independent body with the standing to work across Government, including local government. The Milburn review estimates that for every £1 the Department for Work and Pensions spent on employment support for young people in 2024-25, about £25 was spent on benefits. In its words, “The UK’s approach for decades has been to pay the bill for…youth inactivity, rather than invest in preventing it”. Milburn argues that the Treasury’s usual value-for-money tests do not look far enough ahead to capture the lasting damage of time out of work or training at a young age. Once that is counted, early intervention pays for itself many times over. In the Budget last week, the Chancellor announced that from the next spending review there will be a ringfenced budget for prevention. The question is whether the support for young people at risk of becoming NEET will go in that ringfenced budget. The report shows that we can already identify many of those most at risk while they are still at school, but the pupil premium stops when a young person turns 16, at exactly the point that the risk peaks. Extending it to post-16 learners, including those in further education, is a long-standing call from the Lib Dems. I hope we see it in Milburn’s prescription. We would also like to see a guarantee to every young person of 100 hours of work experience before they turn 18, so that it no longer depends on who their parents happen to know. That brings me to who else needs to be part of the solution. Milburn has said that there is a contract at the heart of all this, referring to the relationship between young people and the state. I suggest that the contract is missing a signatory. For most young people, the first job is offered not by the state but by an employer. If the final report’s recommendations are to work, employers must be part of the bargain. Milburn’s own evidence makes the case. He argues that as the cost of employment rises, the case for taking on someone inexperienced becomes harder, unless employers are given the support to offset the risk. On cost, the national insurance changes of the Government’s first Budget undoubtedly added to the pressure on part-time, entry-level roles, especially in retail and hospitality. That is why we Liberal Democrats have called, at the very least, for a lower rate between £5,000 and £9,100, but cost is only half of it. A large employer can absorb the risk of a young recruit who needs supervision and support; a small firm often cannot, however cheap the hire. That is why we have proposed skills co-operatives as part of the solution, with SMEs pooling training and pastoral support so that no single business carries the whole risk of giving a young person their first start. I realise that the Minister will not pre-empt the final report, so I have three questions of principle. First, the report highlights that no institution is responsible for this. Does the Minister accept it as principle that someone must be, and should that responsibility be with a named local body working within a national framework that guarantees a minimum standard? Secondly, will employment support and post-16 provision for disadvantaged young people count as preventive spending when the new ringfenced budget is set? Thirdly, before any new obligations are placed on young people, will the Government ensure that the support offer is in place? The report says that inaction or tinkering at the edges is itself a decision—a costly one. I hope the Minister will tell us that the final report will be met with something much more than that.

    Hansard source
38. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Helen Maguire

    Equality Act 2010 Guidance: Gynaecological Conditions

    I also have a constituent who suffers with endometriosis and who has been unable to work as a result; she, too, has not received the support that she requires. Although the Equality Act protects pregnancy, does the hon. Member agree that it should also protect gynaecological conditions such as endometriosis? There are other conditions to consider, too. We know that currently one in six women leave the workplace due to endometriosis, because they just experience apathy, lack of understanding and so on, so it is really important that we empower women with conditions such as endometriosis to be able to remain in work.

    Hansard source
39. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Gideon Amos

    Budget Resolutions

    Will the hon. Member give way?

    Hansard source
40. 3 Nov 2026·Parliament·Lib Dem·Gideon Amos

    Budget Resolutions

    Does my hon. Friend agree with my constituent, Philippe Messy, who runs the excellent Little Wine Shop in Taunton, who was hoping to see a big move in VAT, but who has instead described the Budget as “a soufflé that did not rise—flat, flat, flat”?

    Hansard source