Official portrait of Steff Aquarone
UK Parliament, CC BY 3.0

Steff Aquarone

Liberal Democrats MP for North Norfolk since (elected). An MP continuously since .

Parliament recordVoting recordWritten questionsEarly day motions

Entries on this tracker

276

Each filed under the party they sat for that day

Register entries

15

As currently published

Declared while sitting for Lib Dem

£11,543

6 of 15 entries state an amount

Party affiliation

PartyOfficeAreaPeriodBeganEndedSource
Lib DemMPNorth Norfolk – presentelected—Party history

Parliament's party history for this member: Liberal Democrat ( – present).

Register of interests

Every entry the member has in the Register of Members' Financial Interests, as Parliament currently publishes it. The wording and values are the member's own declarations; nothing here has been assessed by this site.

Totals add only the entries that declare an amount received: payments for work, donations, gifts, and funded visits (register categories 1.1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Ongoing employment is listed but not added, because its figure is a rate rather than a sum received. Each entry is dated by when the benefit happened, not when it was registered, and placed under the party the member sat for on that date. A member who changed party therefore has a separate total for each.

DateCategoryEntryDeclared valueSitting forSource
date registered2. Donations and supportDuncan Greenland - £1,500.00£1,500Lib DemRegister record
date registered8. MiscellaneousFellow and director of Radix Big Tent. This is an unpaid role.—Lib DemRegister record
3. Gifts, UK sourcesThe National Liberal Club - £1,100.00£1,100Lib DemRegister record
3. Gifts, UK sourcesInstitute of Directors - £3,995.00£3,995Lib DemRegister record
3. Gifts, UK sourcesSimon Ruddick - £948.00£948Lib DemRegister record
date registered2. Donations and supportChestnut Nursery Schools Limited - £2,000.00£2,000Lib DemRegister record
date registered2. Donations and supportAdam Management Holdings Ltd - £2,000.00£2,000Lib DemRegister record
8. MiscellaneousEconsultancy Limited is a client of Mango Online Learning and Development Solutions Ltd., in which I am a shareholder and director.—Lib DemRegister record
8. MiscellaneousCentaur Media PLC was a client of Mango Online Learning Development Solutions Limited of which I am a shareholder. Any payments will be drawn down as dividends.—Lib DemRegister record
date registered1.2. Ongoing employmentAgreement - £12,469.00Norfolk County Councillor—Lib DemRegister record
date registered1. Employment and earningsCounty Councillor - Norfolk County Councillor—Lib DemRegister record
date registered7. ShareholdingsShares in Getting to Win Ltd.—Lib DemRegister record
date registered7. ShareholdingsShares in Mango Online Learning Development Solutions Limited—Lib DemRegister record
date registered7. ShareholdingsShares in London Trading One Ltd.—Lib DemRegister record
date registered7. ShareholdingsShares in Paygora Ltd.—Lib DemRegister record

Register on Parliament's site

Latest on this tracker 276

  1. ParliamentSteff Aquarone

    Budget Resolutions

    I refer the House to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests, as a former county councillor. It is safe to say that I have not been inundated with emails praising this Budget or crediting it for tackling the thorny issues that my constituents face. Those eligible will welcome the £100 energy bill payment going towards their soaring bills, but the more than 10,000 of my constituents reliant on heating oil will wonder where they are going to find the rest of what has often been a £500 price hike on their oil bills. They will also be asking why the Government have cut VAT for those who rely solely on electricity but are happy to rake in double the VAT receipts from others who face those soaring bills. Removing VAT on those bills would put another £50 back in the pockets of those who have to fill a 1,000 litre tank. The Government are benefiting from a VAT windfall, and it is time that they gave that back to the people suffering from these higher costs. Rural communities in general are struggling as a result of this Budget. In particular, schools are close to their crisis point in too many villages in North Norfolk. Earlier this year, Corpusty primary shut its school gates for the last time. It was heartbreaking for the families affected, and for the children, who were losing the only school that most of them had ever known. We fought tooth and nail against that closure—unlike, I should say, either the Conservative or Reform administrations at County Hall, who stood idly by. I warned anyone who would listen that Corpusty was the canary in the coalmine. Its fundamental challenges were not unique, and it was an indicator of a worrying trend that needs to change. I am deeply fearful of what comes next, because more school leaders and parents are telling me their concerns about their local schools. For all their best efforts, headteachers just cannot make the books balance. It is not their fault; they are being failed by a funding formula that simply does not appreciate the realities of rural life and the importance of rural schools to their communities. In places where there is a fall in the number of children and young people, schools are crying out for a funding package that can help them stay afloat and adapt to a difficult financial and demographic environment. They should feel reassured by the falling rolls funding mechanism, which triggers a £140,000 payout to local authorities through the dedicated schools grant whenever there is a drop of 10%, year on year, in an area’s pupil census. Despite that drop being the reason why that money is coming forward, there is no requirement for it to be spent on those schools, or the issue of falling rolls. It is clear that both sides need to change their processes. The Government need to be more prescriptive about ringfencing, and I will argue that it is not an outlandish ask for falling rolls funding to be dedicated to falling rolls. On their side, the local authority cannot just use this as another sticking plaster to cover educational funding crises. If we do not get a grip on the schools crisis, we face challenging times in our rural communities. If we lose the schools, we lose the working-age population. If we do not fund rural schools properly, whole communities suffer. If there is no local school, the area is not a viable place for a young family to live. That means no one of working age to do the inherently rural jobs in farming, or in the energy industry or defence. In a community without working-age people, there is no one to staff the doctor’s surgery, provide care or even pour a cup of coffee on a Monday morning. We must act now if we want our cherished rural and coastal communities to flourish, and if there is to be good growth in every postcode, there must be cross-governmental support for small rural schools. The Government’s goals—not just for education and economic growth, but for transport, housing, climate change, food security and even defence—all depend on a vibrant future for our rural communities, yet this Budget’s measures are just another example of the Government working in silos, which is not working for our rural areas. It is time to re-establish hope for rural communities by backing small schools.

    Hansard source
  2. ParliamentSteff Aquarone

    SEND Provision: Rural Communities

    The hon. Member is making a most informed speech. In North Norfolk I have heard from several families whose children cannot get, or have struggled to get, access to specialist settings. Children must travel further from home in rural areas, which is tougher for them and increases the transport bill. Does the hon. Member agree we need to do much more to ensure that children and families in rural communities can access specialist support when they need it?

    Hansard source
  3. ParliamentSteff Aquarone

    SEND Provision: Rural Communities

    To go back to the Minister’s point about partnership working, the hon. Member for South West Norfolk (Terry Jermy) talked about health visitors, rurality, schools, transport and the impact on work—those are five Departments. In a previous life, she and I met and discussed the need to shake things up in Westminster and rewire Government so that it works for people and not within silos. Does she agree that this is a classic example of how the Government need to change the way they work so that they can serve humans and not processes?

    Hansard source
  4. ParliamentSteff Aquarone

    Support for Farmers

    I am pleased that the Liberal Democrats are leading from the front for our rural communities by having this debate. Norfolk is a rural county and a farming county. It is also a county right at the forefront of the climate and nature emergency. Right along our coastline, which is the fastest eroding in north-west Europe, we see residents facing the loss of their homes and villages facing the loss of their identity as rising sea levels increase the speed of erosion in villages such as Happisburgh and Trimingham. Our precious natural environment with rare chalk streams and species found nowhere else in the country is at risk of collapse without action on the emergency facing them.<span id="1220" class="column-number" data-column-number="1220"></span> One of our strongest allies in tackling the climate emergency is farming, and that is why the SFI is so important. Farmers are custodians of the natural environment; they care for it, they look after it and they will pass it on to generations after them. They want our natural environment to be protected and our climate to remain stable, not just for the greater good but because it is vital to keep their farms viable. The importance of the scheme cannot be overstated. It is a crucial part of keeping our rural environments healthy and protected, and of enabling farmers to do so too. How on earth, then, can it be right that the process for securing the funding was such a catastrophe? A mad rush, online queuing and effectively a sell-out event in a matter of hours. I know the Prime Minister is keen on Manchesterism for the whole country, but I do not think my farmers knew that meant making SFI applications follow the same system as getting Oasis tickets. That farce speaks to a much deeper issue. I strongly believe that there is a lack of understanding of the workings of rural life and rural communities because they do not fit neatly into Whitehall’s prescribed models or spreadsheets. Securing funding for sustainable land management might make the difference between a farm being able to employ someone to work the land and not. If that person is not employed, they will not bring their family to the local village to live. That means that perhaps their children do not attend the village school, which then cannot make the numbers work within the funding formula. Those young people would not be able to stay and start a family themselves even if we were to tackle the cost of living crisis, which is significantly sharper the further from a city someone is. When working-age people cannot afford to live and thrive in rural and coastal areas, everybody loses. As things stand, our communities are as vulnerable to erosion as our coastline, and we need powerful representation at the heart of Government to stand up for them. Just like in our natural environment, our rural communities are deeply interconnected. We are an ecosystem: we rely on symbiotic relationships, on food chains and on a stable environment. When the science of rural life is disregarded and the knock-on effects are ignored, we end up with calamitous decisions such as this. So much of this situation is down to how Whitehall works, or does not. Food security, climate change, coastal erosion, flooding, farming policy, environmental protection, rural communities—in North Norfolk all our affairs are rural. Yet real change on these issues cannot be handled by DEFRA alone. Those are the things that matter to people, to the lives we lead, and they cut across the silos of Government. I firmly believe that if we had a better understanding of rural life across Whitehall, disasters such as the one we saw with the SFI scheme would just not be allowed to happen. An urgent, fundamental reassessment of how the state is supposed to work for rural communities is needed, because at the moment it simply does not.

    Hansard source
  5. ParliamentSteff Aquarone

    Topical Questions

    <Question HRSContentId="{28D6B817-DA7B-42B5-961F-45142B2356D6}">T1. <QuestionText HRSContentId="{D4B515F5-5EDB-4775-A02D-1D631AC401C1}"> If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.</QuestionText></Question>

    Hansard source
  6. ParliamentSteff Aquarone

    Topical Questions

    If the Treasury wants a quick trick to increase tax receipts from new employment, may I suggest that the Chancellor takes steps to boost rural bus connectivity? North Norfolk has independent operators such as Central Connect which, in spite of challenges facing the sector, has managed to double its bus frequency in Stalham and Hoveton. It wants to go further. Can he tell us how he will work with the Department for Transport to ensure barriers are lifted and support is provided to bring more buses to my constituents?

    Hansard source
  7. ParliamentSteff Aquarone

    Local Government Reorganisation

    North Norfolk has more than 2,000 people waiting for housing, a coastline that we are trying to prevent falling into the North sea and endless challenges from being an underfunded rural authority. Now it has been made to waste £600,000 on a local government reorganisation programme that the Secretary of State demanded and has now gone back on. One question will be about the future of devolution for Norfolk, but what people in North Norfolk will be thinking first is, “We want our money back.” Will she give it to us?

    Hansard source
  8. ParliamentSteff Aquarone

    Economic Growth

    The Government talk a lot about how they will create economic growth. There is no way for them just to legislate their way to growth; there are, however, plenty of ways to legislate against it, as small rural businesses in North Norfolk know only too well. Will the Minister tell those rural businesses what she is doing to help them grow? More importantly, what things that get in their way will she stop doing?

    Hansard source
  9. ParliamentSteff Aquarone

    Health Bill

    Amendment 19 closes a dangerous gap in the Bill and commands the support of Members from across the House. It is right that clause 4 calls for the Health Secretary to reduce inequality of access to health services, but the Bill must explicitly cover rural and coastal health inequalities, or else less densely populated communities will always lose. At face value, it makes sense to measure success by the greatest number helped; however, in the long run, that is a false economy, as delayed diagnosis and treatment ultimately cost the NHS more. It is a little bit like access to high-speed broadband—we rolled out the first phase to the places where the most people could be connected, which rewarded the Government and providers with some impressive-sounding numbers while disguising failure in the margins. Rural and coastal communities are literally and politically at the end of the line, and are therefore reached last.

    Hansard source
  10. ParliamentSteff Aquarone

    Health Bill

    I absolutely agree. In order to achieve genuine equality of access, the Government must go outside-in; in other words, they must design provision around the hardest places to serve—my hon. Friend gives a great example—and then work inwards from there. “If Australia can effectively serve communities living in the remote outback, we can meet the needs of people living in rural and coastal England.” Those are the words of the right hon. Member for Ilford North (Wes Streeting) when he was Health Secretary. Not only do I agree with him, but I challenge the current Health Secretary to turn her Government’s own words into law. We got it wrong with broadband; we cannot afford to get it wrong with people’s health.<span id="808" class="column-number" data-column-number="808"></span> In North Norfolk, I see the struggle for health access and outcomes at first hand. People living on the coast start with half the access that those in inland areas have. Conventional service models assume that people can access healthcare from any direction, but for our coastal communities, half of the area is the sea. The sea may be beautiful, but it does not run a bus service, staff a clinic, or provide a patient catchment. Coastal communities, which may have sparse populations and poor transport, need more local points of care, not fewer. On top of that, the services we do have are burdened by exceptionally long waits. We are not unique in this; some of the poorest healthcare access and outcomes can be found in communities like mine. We know the challenges for health and wellbeing in these areas from the excellent work of Professor Sir Chris Whitty. He spelled out that we suffer from shorter life expectancy and higher rates of major chronic illness, higher rates of alcohol and drug-related harm, and more cardiovascular and chronic lung conditions. These are very serious problems, and they cannot remain an afterthought in national health policy. National systems must not mistake population density for severity of need. Besides, when problems are caught earlier and treated faster, it leads to better outcomes. That is one of the reasons why I was so frustrated to be told by the Government before recess that they have “no plans” to provide an urgent treatment centre at Cromer hospital in my constituency, although it would transform access to urgent care across North Norfolk. I am putting the Department on notice today: my constituents and I will continue pressing the case until Ministers reconsider. Let me tell the House what these inequalities mean in human terms. They mean that constituents like Kelly, who has been waiting more than 70 weeks for a hip replacement, are living every day in pain. Another constituent, Samantha, told me that she waited 30 weeks to see a gynaecologist. The NHS standard is 18 weeks. Appallingly, our wait times made a young woman so unwell that she was forced to sacrifice her education; during the wait, her symptoms worsened to the point that she had to step back from the degree that she was studying for. I heard from Ian, who has metastatic prostate cancer and requires treatment at the Norfolk and Norwich hospital. It is a half-day trip for him by car to get the essential treatment that he needs. He told me that he considered using a local bus service, but that it would be an hour just to get there. He lives with a damaged bladder, due to his condition, and he told me that it makes life “very unpleasant”. I would go further and say that it is undignified and dehumanising.

    Hansard source

2024 General Election: North Norfolk

Held . Recorded result: LD Gain. Majority 2,585. 47,043 votes cast from an electorate of 71,438. Parties are as each candidate stood at the time.

CandidatePartyVotesShare
Steffan AquaroneLiberal Democrat19,48841.4%
Duncan BakerConservative16,90335.9%
Jason PatchettReform UK6,36813.5%
Cathy Cordiner-AchenbachLabour2,8786.1%
Liz DixonGreen Party1,4063.0%

Election result on Parliament's site

Parliamentary career

Seats held

SeatDates
North NorfolkElected 1 time – present

Committee memberships

CommitteeDates
Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] –
Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] –
Transport Committee – present

Career on Parliament's site

Published contact details

Parliamentary office

House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA

0207 219 7585

[email protected]

Constituency office

Constituency office

01692 763247; 07879 451608

X (formerly Twitter)

x.com/Steffanaquarone

Only the details Parliament publishes for this member. Contact page on Parliament's site

Profile data retrieved from Parliament on .