Official portrait of Rachel Blake
UK Parliament, CC BY 3.0

Rachel Blake

Labour Party MP for Cities of London and Westminster since (elected). An MP continuously since .

Parliament recordVoting recordWritten questionsEarly day motions

Entries on this tracker

240

Each filed under the party they sat for that day

Register entries

3

As currently published

Declared while sitting for Labour

£9,625

1 of 3 entries state an amount

Party affiliation

PartyOfficeAreaPeriodBeganEndedSource
LabourMPCities of London and Westminster – presentelected—Party history

Parliament's party history for this member: Labour ( – present).

Register of interests

Every entry the member has in the Register of Members' Financial Interests, as Parliament currently publishes it. The wording and values are the member's own declarations; nothing here has been assessed by this site.

Totals add only the entries that declare an amount received: payments for work, donations, gifts, and funded visits (register categories 1.1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Ongoing employment is listed but not added, because its figure is a rate rather than a sum received. Each entry is dated by when the benefit happened, not when it was registered, and placed under the party the member sat for on that date. A member who changed party therefore has a separate total for each.

DateCategoryEntryDeclared valueSitting forSource
date registered10. Family members lobbyingMarc Francis employed as Lobbyist—LabourRegister record
2. Donations and supportAugust Ltd - £9,625.00£9,625LabourRegister record
8. MiscellaneousBoard Member of Radix Big Tent. This is an unpaid role.—LabourRegister record

Register on Parliament's site

Latest on this tracker 240

  1. ParliamentRachel Blake

    Budget Resolutions

    I know that it is unconventional to crowdsource one’s speech on the Budget, but I happened to do my annual online Budget Q&A last night, and it was an absolutely joyful experience. The key themes that were raised with me were: is this Budget bold enough; and what does it do for our communities here in the Cities of London and Westminster? Members will be delighted and perhaps unsurprised to know that the key questions raised by my constituents are very similar to those that are being raised here in the Chamber. It is really clear to me, as it is to my constituents, that this Government cannot control every challenge beyond our shores, but we can seek stability, strengthen our resilience and support those most in need. The foundations for a more stable economy were established by my right hon. Friend the Member for Leeds West and Pudsey (Rachel Reeves) when she made the tough choices to stabilise our economy. What we need now is for families to have confidence that they can plan for the future. Businesses need confidence to invest, expand and create jobs, and our economy needs confidence that public finances are being managed responsibly. That is why this Government’s commitment to fiscal discipline and credible fiscal rules is so important. Economic credibility is not an abstract concept discussed only in this Chamber in Westminster; it affects mortgage rates, investment decisions, business confidence, household budgets and, increasingly, whether people can afford to own a home of their own. That is in stark contrast to the damaging effects of the mini-Budget that the Conservatives want us to forget, but we very much remember it and, sadly, our constituents remember it through their day-to-day budgets. This Government rightly take a responsible approach, and I particularly welcome those measures that are supporting enterprise, investment and job creation. My constituency, the Cities of London and Westminster, has more jobs than people in it, and every day we see the contribution that businesses make to our economy, from small independent firms to globally recognised companies. Economic security must also include housing security. Far too many people, particularly in London, cannot afford a home of their own. What was particularly important to me in this Budget was the announcement of £432 million of additional investment to stabilise support for the most vulnerable. It was an absolute honour to welcome the Prime Minister and the Chancellor to my constituency on Monday, where we recognised the long-standing work of frontline rough sleeping outreach workers. This was a long-standing call from those who work in the sector to recognise the skilled work they do every single day to help the most vulnerable. I am proud that this Government have made the decision to make long-term investment to keep people off the streets. Not only is it the right decision and the compassionate decision—

    Hansard source
  2. ParliamentRachel Blake

    Budget Resolutions

    I will not give way—we will hopefully move to a vote soon. This is the right moral decision and the right compassionate decision. It aligns with our values—it should align with everybody’s values—and it is also the right economic decision. It is not in the interests of public spending to allow people to live on the streets. I pay tribute to the work of the Connection at St Martin’s, which hosted us that day. We have seen the risks that the Opposition are prepared to take with our economy. This Government are taking a responsible approach, which enables us to make those investments in some of the most vulnerable in society. I commend this Budget to the House, and I commend this responsible approach to fiscal discipline, which allows us to make those important political choices.

    Hansard source
  3. ParliamentRachel Blake

    Social Housing Bill (Fourth sitting)

    During this debate, there have been accusations of ideological stances from both parties, particularly on the right to buy. To bring us back to a practical question, does the hon. Member not recognise that new clause 26 would be a duplicative measure, adding to data that is already collected? Does he not agree that up to three additional sales would be necessary just to replace one home, particularly in London, which he and I represent different parts of?

    Hansard source
  4. ParliamentRachel Blake

    Social Housing Bill (Fourth sitting)

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Western. I oppose the new clause. It fits every criterion of a piece of divisive rhetoric by focusing on an issue that has a relatively small impact within the broader picture. It seeks to amplify fear because it is based on an inadequate assessment of what is actually the issue here: the overall supply of genuinely affordable homes. There have been a number of—I hope—mistakes, or some misspeaking, in the Opposition’s remarks on what a taxpayer is. I am sure that in any closing or future remarks, Opposition Members will acknowledge that people with indefinite leave to remain do pay tax and therefore should be considered taxpayers. They have implied that it is only taxpayers who pay for council homes and social homes; it is also those people who pay rent. I believe they might want to correct those remarks. I want to ask the Opposition a few practical questions. First, what would they propose happens to the very small number of families with British children where the lead tenant, for whatever reason, is not a British <span id="169" class="column-number" data-column-number="169"></span>citizen? Would they really see those British children denied the opportunity to live in a safe, secure, warm and well-designed home? Why on earth are they bringing this proposal forward without acknowledging the role of people with settled status? Finally, one question that has not been asked: have the Opposition speakers spoken to their colleagues about the approach to the common travel arrangement that they have brought up today?

    Hansard source
  5. ParliamentRachel Blake

    Social Housing Bill (First sitting)

    I draw Members’ attention to my category 8—miscellaneous—interest.

    Hansard source
  6. ParliamentRachel Blake

    Social Housing Bill (First sitting)

    On new clause 55, can the hon. Member share the evidence base for his proposal, including the number of tenants aged between 16 and 25? I struggle to believe that the proposal would make any difference in terms of home ownership for people aged between 16 <span id="8" class="column-number" data-column-number="8"></span>and 25. In fact, it is the long-run shortage of genuinely affordable homes, rental properties and home ownership products that is responsible for young people struggling to get on to the housing ladder.

    Hansard source
  7. ParliamentRachel Blake

    Social Housing Bill (First sitting)

    Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

    Hansard source
  8. ParliamentRachel Blake

    Social Housing Bill (First sitting)

    I am listening with interest to the right hon. Member’s remarks, and I have some professional experience in this area. Amendments 95 and 98 seem more about delaying a reasonable approach to the Government administering right-to-buy receipts. I am interested to know what the Opposition think would be the alternative to any kind of movement of right-to-buy receipts between local authorities. Would it be entirely acceptable for right-to-buy receipts not to be reinvested in council homes?

    Hansard source
  9. ParliamentRachel Blake

    Social Housing Bill (First sitting)

    I will have a go at delving into the process point; I do think that these are simply delaying amendments from the Opposition, but I will nevertheless engage on the principle of the process point. What is it about a determination, which would be open to written or oral questions, that the Opposition do not think is transparent and democratically accountable?

    Hansard source
  10. ParliamentRachel Blake

    Social Housing Bill (Second sitting)

    I draw Members’ attention to my category 8 —miscellaneous—interest.

    Hansard source

2024 General Election: Cities of London and Westminster

Held . Recorded result: Lab Gain. Majority 2,708. 39,215 votes cast from an electorate of 73,369. Parties are as each candidate stood at the time.

CandidatePartyVotesShare
Rachel BlakeLabour15,30239.0%
Tim BarnesConservative12,59432.1%
Edward LucasLiberal Democrat4,33511.1%
Rajiv SinhaGreen Party2,8447.3%
Tarun GhulatiReform UK2,7527.0%
Hoz ShafieiWorkers Party of Britain7271.9%
Liz BurfordRejoin EU3520.9%
Huge De BurghSocial Democratic Party1100.3%
John GenericIndependent1100.3%
Tim HallettIndependent550.1%
Matthew CarrIndependent340.1%

Election result on Parliament's site

Parliamentary career

Seats held

SeatDates
Cities of London and WestminsterElected 1 time – present

Government posts

PostDates
Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)HM Treasury –
Committee memberships 12
CommitteeDates
Social Housing Bill [Lords] – present
House of Commons Commission – present
Restoration and Renewal Client Board – present
Pension Schemes Bill –
Statutory Instruments (Joint Committee) –
Statutory Instruments (Select Committee) –
Finance Bill –
Treasury Committee –
Renters’ Rights Bill –
House of Commons Commission –
Members Estimate Committee – present
Restoration and Renewal Client Board –

Career on Parliament's site

Published contact details

Parliamentary office

House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA

0207 219 6543

[email protected]

Constituency office

Constituency office

[email protected]

X (formerly Twitter)

x.com/RNBlake

Only the details Parliament publishes for this member. Contact page on Parliament's site

Profile data retrieved from Parliament on .