Social Housing Bill (Fourth sitting)
My hon. Friend the Member for Uxbridge and South Ruislip has put the points I was going to make very eloquently, but I want <span id="167" class="column-number" data-column-number="167"></span>to take the opportunity to say, as the Member of Parliament for Barking, that a high proportion of my constituents are from different heritage backgrounds. The truth is that constituents who have secured indefinite leave to remain have lived in this country for a number of years and have made a significant contribution to our society, not least through the taxes that they have paid as they have worked here legally. The very argument that we should be fairer in our approach to allocating social housing is reflected in our system, which allows those who have paid their taxes and secured indefinite leave to remain to then access social housing when in need. Those who have no recourse to public funds cannot access the social housing in the first place. I appreciate the argument that we must have a fair approach to allocating resources. I accept that, and my constituents in Barking also want a fair approach, but what is fair about not recognising that many people cannot afford to apply to become a British citizen but do have indefinite leave to remain and have contributed by paying their taxes, so they should be able to access the same rights as everybody else? This is a divisive and unnecessary new clause. I do not think that it speaks to the spirit of the debate we have heard so far. It will do nothing to contribute to the additional social homes that we need in this country.