Official portrait of Lola McEvoy
UK Parliament, CC BY 3.0

Lola McEvoy

Labour Party MP for Darlington since (elected). An MP continuously since .

Parliament recordVoting recordWritten questionsEarly day motions

Entries on this tracker

148

Each filed under the party they sat for that day

Register entries

2

As currently published

Declared while sitting for Labour

£1,600

1 of 2 entries state an amount

Party affiliation

PartyOfficeAreaPeriodBeganEndedSource
LabourMPDarlington – presentelected—Party history

Parliament's party history for this member: Labour ( – present).

Register of interests

Every entry the member has in the Register of Members' Financial Interests, as Parliament currently publishes it. The wording and values are the member's own declarations; nothing here has been assessed by this site.

Totals add only the entries that declare an amount received: payments for work, donations, gifts, and funded visits (register categories 1.1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Ongoing employment is listed but not added, because its figure is a rate rather than a sum received. Each entry is dated by when the benefit happened, not when it was registered, and placed under the party the member sat for on that date. A member who changed party therefore has a separate total for each.

DateCategoryEntryDeclared valueSitting forSource
3. Gifts, UK sourcesBuilt Environment Networking Ltd - £1,600.00£1,600LabourRegister record
8. MiscellaneousUnpaid membership of a panel that collectively decides on the location of the installation of green plaques in Darlington. The plaques commemorate sites of local industrial historic significance. No official role within the panel nor any veto powers. This is an unpaid role.—LabourRegister record

Register on Parliament's site

Latest on this tracker 148

  1. ParliamentLola McEvoy

    Budget Resolutions

    I am the Member of Parliament for Darlington, the home of “No. 11 North”—the Darlington economic campus. I want to put on record my thanks to Beth, Joe, Laura and all the civil servants who worked round the clock to ensure that we could deliver the Chancellor’s first Budget. The Treasury campus in Darlington was the brainchild of the previous Government, and it was funded by this Government to the tune of £118 million for a brand-new hub. It is proof that the best interventions from this place garner cross-party support. I am sure that everyone in this Chamber will agree with investing record amounts in defence to support our world-leading armed forces and defence industry; backing British inventors, innovators and founders, so that if someone has a great idea here, we will make sure they can succeed here; £100 cashback in January for energy bills for 45,000 households in Darlington, and hundreds of thousands more across the country, which is much needed and well received; and hope for our high streets, with a freeze on business rates and an increase in the business rates relief threshold to £18,000, which will benefit 222 business in Darlington. I am particularly pleased to see that these measures are paid for by the global e-marketplaces and by taking the relief from those pesky vape shops. The country and, I am sure, their representatives across the House can all support that. What seems to divide the House is how we should deliver it. It is right that this Government, under this Chancellor, continue their commitment to fiscal responsibility. We must reduce the amount we are paying on debt interest. I welcome the fact that those who have made record profits off the global insecurity that has driven cost of living pressures on households across our country will pay a little bit more through the bank levy. The truth remains that we will not spend more than we earn, but despite record investment, incredible world-leading growth sectors and an army of grafters—yes, in every postcode—we are getting battered by global storms. That is not the fault of the Conservative party, but we feel that the severity of the impact is. I welcome this Budget’s ringfencing of spending on preventive policies and services. Preventive funding should be ringfenced. If the last Government had rediverted the money that they saved through short-term cuts into upgrading the grid, building new nuclear, building new renewables to create energy security, building new hospitals, building council homes—or building any homes—or building roads, building railways or, indeed, investing in our armed forces, perhaps they would still be trusted with an ounce of public money. Instead, they proved to a whole generation that they should not have the keys to Whitehall. They oversaw some of the worst business deals on record, incentivising hotel use by private contractors to house people seeking asylum and outsourcing our pensions, our social care and our post. They failed to prepare for the pandemic, and then they crashed the economy, leading to the fastest annual fall in living standards since records began. Yes, this Government have more to do. I welcome the myriad interventions the Chancellor has made in this Budget aimed at protecting our economy, our industry and our security.

    Hansard source
  2. ParliamentLola McEvoy

    Budget Resolutions

    I absolutely agree. The standing charge policy has come up on the doorstep and has really cut through, so I am delighted to see it. So yes, Darlington is home to “No. 11 North”. Yes, it is home to the world’s first passenger railway, and home to pease pudding, and it is soon to be home to a brand-new multimillion-pound STEM training centre, backed by £16 million from the last Budget, backed by industry and backed by £5 million of Pride in Place funding. Yes, we do have all that, but we are way more than all those things; we are a test case for good growth and we are bucking the national trend. We are a resilient, investable ecosystem. I grew up in a part of Darlington that was historically called Hopetown. We had hope 200 years ago, and we hope again.

    Hansard source
  3. ParliamentLola McEvoy

    Topical Questions

    <Question HRSContentId="{237D6651-A6FB-47A0-9486-C9124BE4A1A9}">T5. <QuestionText HRSContentId="{DA916794-649E-4317-83B7-789A3394BC10}"></QuestionText>The Department is aware of my increasing frustration at balaclava-clad yobs tearing up and down on dirtbikes in Darlington. Indeed, the rest of the House is increasingly frustrated and we need action. Will the Minister and the Department commit to licensing or registration at the point of sale to aid the valiant effort of our police forces in the north-east?</Question>

    Hansard source
  4. ParliamentLola McEvoy

    E-scooters and E-bikes: Regulation

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Stringer. I pay tribute to the hon. Member for Epsom and Ewell (Helen Maguire) for bringing this important debate to Westminster Hall. On 16 May 2025, just before 1 pm, 86-year-old Gloria Stephenson was walking her daughter’s dog using a zebra crossing when she was hit by an 18-year-old riding a Sur-Ron e-bike. Gloria died at the scene. My constituent Julie Francis lost her mother that day. She has a petition for more police funding and has been a vocal campaigner for more action to get these bikes off the road. In September, I brought her to Parliament to meet the Policing Minister. Julie’s ask of us all is simple: “Don’t let my mother’s death be in vain.” The rise of e-bikes and e-scooters in Darlington is a major problem. It is obvious from the cross-section of representation in the Chamber that we are not alone. The balaclava-wearing men tearing through our town and deliberately intimidating everyone else, on and off the road, are a visible degradation of our collective social contract. They are literally running amuck, Minister, and my constituents and I have had enough. “Ban them” is the most tempered call from residents, and the most appropriate for a parliamentary debate; many have suggested other measures, which I will not go into now. But the truth is that they are banned; it is already illegal to ride these dirt bikes, motocross bikes and e-scooters on our roads. Durham police are doing a great job of seizing and crushing them—I attended a scrapyard recently and crushed 70 of them with the police—but aside from that, they do not have the powers alone to tackle the problem. One reason why this issue has become so prolific is that it requires a multi-Department approach. Will the Minister review the dirt bike licensing regime, because it is clearly ineffective? In the north-east, we have 34 licensed Sur-Ron bikes; I saw more than that crushed two weeks ago. Will he consider mirroring the gun licensing regulation to enforce stricter requirements for legitimate UK purchases, increasing the penalty for driving dirt bikes without a licence, and banning the sale of e-scooters entirely in our high-street retailers? Will he bring together a cross-Department taskforce to regulate the import of these dangerous kits and, ultimately, get these illegal bikes off our streets?

    Hansard source
  5. ParliamentLola McEvoy

    E-scooters and E-bikes: Regulation

    Having had 14 years in power to do something about this issue, the Conservative party might be expected to support the next stage of our policing regulations, as set out in the King’s Speech. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that it would be great if the upcoming policing Bill contained provisions on the regulation of off-road bikes?

    Hansard source
  6. ParliamentLola McEvoy

    Underperforming NHS Trusts: Government Oversight

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Stuart. I commend the hon. Member for Chelmsford (Marie Goldman) for securing the debate, which is about—politely—underperforming trusts. This is Breast Cancer Awareness Month, and I will be talking about the breast cancer failings at my local trust, County Durham and Darlington NHS foundation trust. In April 2025, the trust began going through the case files of women who had been patients of its breast services between 2023 and 2025. Of the 538 women whose cases have been reviewed, 321 experienced some <span id="171WH" class="column-number" data-column-number="171WH"></span>form of harm: 77 suffered significant harm, 20 underwent unnecessary mastectomies, and the trust has confirmed that one woman has died, and it is currently investigating the situation. Let me take a moment to reflect on that. The women in this room know how much pain we are deemed to have to endure and put up with. But to hear that women put their trust in our NHS at a time of great stress and anxiety and had their breasts removed unnecessarily is truly abhorrent. The trust has rightly changed leadership and is now undertaking a further review of the treatment given to women by the breast services from 2015 onwards. The cases of a further 4,500 women need to be reviewed by specialists. The current rate of review—538 cases a year—means that, without further resource to fund more specialists to review the cases, the process could go well into the 2030s. Recent <em>Health Service Journal</em> modelling estimates that the work could cost the trust £4.5 million. The trust does not get any financial support for that work, which I find counterintuitive, as the victims need answers and justice, and the trust must learn the lessons from what went wrong while also carrying on its vital duties. Campaigners are calling for a public inquiry—I support them and understand why—but I fear that it will take years and years for answers to be found and lessons to be learned. The Prime Minister recently agreed and said in a BBC interview: “Of course there needs to be the fullest possible inquiry…we will ensure that those affected have all of the answers that they need”. He said that there are different routes to the truth but, without additional resources, how can the trust be expected to keep other services running effectively while conducting the inquiry? It will inevitably go into debt and probably be bailed out by the Department of Health and Social Care—that is, the taxpayer. Given that the Health Bill, which is focused on abolishing NHS England and giving direct powers back to the Secretary of State, is going through the House, we have the legislative opportunity to change the culture from fearing and fighting for scrutiny to funding and facilitating it. Our trust needs to provide the answers and support the affected patients in a timely and compassionate manner, and to improve and change services to gather the information necessary to do that. We all in this House agree that patients across the country deserve better.

    Hansard source
  7. ParliamentLola McEvoy

    Engagements

    <Question HRSContentId="{5C072A3E-9F47-495C-94C5-98B11C7CFE25}">Q13. <QuestionText HRSContentId="{44952F8F-4E71-4BBF-BEE3-21AE356D95B6}"></QuestionText>Olivia is a young constituent in Darlington. Her testimony was instrumental in securing a ban on stranger contact for under-16s. She has the letter that the Prime Minister sent her framed on her wall. Olivia and millions of young people across the country will be safer because of him: his commitment to hear the stories of ordinary people and the injustices that they face, and then to take action, has delivered real change. Given that social media has, for better or worse, played such an influential role in our tenure in this House, will the Prime Minister share with all of us any of the viral moments that have had cut-through in the Starmer household?</Question>

    Hansard source
  8. ParliamentLola McEvoy

    Civil Service Pensions

    I recently met a woman who had spent her career fighting fraud for the Department for Work and Pensions. If she had behaved in the way that this company is behaving around her pension, she would have been fired on the spot. It is one rule for ordinary working people and another for these outsourced companies, which behave so terribly on the taxpayers’ money. In Darlington, we have a Capita base with over 1,000 employees. Capita recently announced that it could no longer afford to pay the real living wage. How much profit is it making on this £200 million contract that it is failing to deliver?

    Hansard source
  9. ParliamentLola McEvoy

    Climate Change

    The temperature right now in London is about 35°, compared with a perfect 25° in Darlington—so take me home! I want to put on the record my thanks to all the staff working to support us today, especially the armed police and the Doorkeepers in their three-piece suits. The effects of this heatwave will put huge pressure on our public and essential services, and we should all spare a thought for any woman giving birth today, for the families living in overcrowded accommodation, and for anyone with medical vulnerabilities. This weather is deeply dangerous and, in proposing inaction in the face of this climate emergency, the Conservative party must be living on another planet. I may not be a climate change expert—my brother is a geography teacher, so I am under serious pressure—but I do know my regional economy. I know that the net zero project has delivered incredible impacts and huge investment in my area, and the Minister has shown excellent leadership on this issue. Although today’s extreme weather makes her point for her, the Government have been working hand in glove with industry to ensure that we reap the economic rewards of the transition to net zero. At the G7 last week, the Government secured £1.3 billion for battery energy storage systems so that we can end the ludicrous practice of curtailment of our wind farms.<span id="450" class="column-number" data-column-number="450"></span> In recent weeks, we have seen a co-ordinated effort by the once-credible Conservative party to paint decarbonisation as anti-jobs, anti-growth and anti-industrial communities. Although I absolutely back the calls from the trade unions to ensure a proper, equitable career transition for those working in the oil and gas industry, saying that this Government’s commitment to net zero is bad for our economy is for the birds. In my region, we have a world-leading carbon capture project, the East Coast Cluster, which includes the net zero Teesside power plant. The plant, which is powered by gas, will capture 2 million tonnes of CO<sub>2 </sub>annually and create enough power for 1.3 million homes. This technology will be globally significant, boosting our ability to support other countries that are looking for solutions to their transition, which we can sell. The technology is backed by a £22 billion investment, alongside the green hydrogen on Teesside and many other innovations. Our region is powering ahead. We have huge innovations through the Northern Endurance Partnership, and Low Carbon Materials, which is a local start-up, was shortlisted for the Earthshot prize. Net zero jobs are 40% more productive than the national average, with wages 15% higher than the UK norm. In other words, these are not just more jobs; they are better jobs. That is the assessment of the CBI, not the Labour Government. Whether it is the electric trains being built at Hitachi or what will soon to be the largest wind farm in the world at Dogger Bank, our region is home not only to the best people in England, but to the most net zero businesses per head in the country. I say to the Minister: all clean power to your elbow. Industry is investing and innovating. The public support action and want subsidies, with two thirds wanting action on climate change. Carbon-intensive industries, and workers in these industries, are calling for equitable alternatives and for the same pay and progression as other sectors.

    Hansard source
  10. ParliamentLola McEvoy

    Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

    In my constituency of Darlington, we know the economic importance of the steel industry, and many of my constituents bear the scars of the Conservative party’s unwavering worship of <span id="229" class="column-number" data-column-number="229"></span>the global free market. Regardless of the social, economic, community or security costs, they badly let us down. The last Government refused to step in for our highly skilled essential steel workers in Redcar, leading to the loss of thousands of jobs and the closure of a 170-year-old industry, and thousands more jobs in the supply chain were lost. The Conservatives demanded a cap on the cost to the Treasury for this essential intervention to protect out sovereign steel capacity, which shows that they still do not get it. It shows their fundamental misunderstanding of the mistakes they made while they were in government. Despite their historic defeat, they refuse to accept that their inaction on steel has already cost the taxpayer dearly, and not only in significant employment tax contributions but in the business contributions of this critical industry’s supply chain. It is their inaction that chilled investment. We know that thriving supply chains boost local employment and incubate home-grown entrepreneurs. They boost confidence locally, and industrial communities such as ours support and cultivate thriving, close-knit business ecosystems—something that we in Darlington still benefit from greatly, despite the closure of SSI, Cleveland Bridge and British Steel on Whessoe Road. The vacant South Works site in Darlington, which is currently available to rent, is 131,000 square feet and comes with three cranes. If anyone is looking for a magnificent industrial steel site in the heart of the country’s most investable town, please do contact me, and I will happily negotiate and advocate for a discounted rent from the hon. Member for Boston and Skegness (Richard Tice). The pride that our community has in a critical, century-old industry cannot be overstated. It is vital for wellbeing, but it is security that is essential for growth. People employed in critical industries, whether self-employed, businesses or workers, can afford to spend locally—they have the confidence to get the kitchen done, or take the family out for a meal. It is insecurity that chills investment and growth. By securing this critical sovereign industry, this Labour Government are demonstrating and living our values, and delivering on the change that we were sent here to make. The difference could not be more clear: where the last Government allowed an essential, critical, highly skilled, historical British industry to be decimated by inaction and ignorance, this Labour Government promote our most qualified steel industry expert to the Front Bench to protect high-skilled jobs, stand up for our supply chains, champion our communities and nationalise steel in the national interest—and I, for one, say all power to them.

    Hansard source

2024 General Election: Darlington

Held . Recorded result: Lab Gain. Majority 2,298. 42,378 votes cast from an electorate of 70,672. Parties are as each candidate stood at the time.

CandidatePartyVotesShare
Lola McEvoyLabour16,62139.2%
Peter GibsonConservative14,32333.8%
Michael WalkerReform UK6,85216.2%
Matthew SnedkerGreen Party2,8476.7%
Simon ThorleyLiberal Democrat1,7354.1%

Election result on Parliament's site

Parliamentary career

Seats held

SeatDates
DarlingtonElected 1 time – present

Committee memberships

CommitteeDates
Treasury Committee –
Renters’ Rights Bill –

Career on Parliament's site

Published contact details

Parliamentary office

House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA

[email protected]

Constituency office

35-36 Blackwellgate, Darlington, DL1 5HW

01325 526655

Only the details Parliament publishes for this member. Contact page on Parliament's site

Profile data retrieved from Parliament on .