Official portrait of John Slinger
UK Parliament, CC BY 3.0

John Slinger

Labour Party MP for Rugby since (elected). An MP continuously since .

Parliament recordVoting recordWritten questionsEarly day motions

Entries on this tracker

452

Each filed under the party they sat for that day

Register entries

3

As currently published

Declared while sitting for Labour

£19,081.85

2 of 3 entries state an amount

Party affiliation

PartyOfficeAreaPeriodBeganEndedSource
LabourMPRugby – presentelected—Party history

Parliament's party history for this member: Labour ( – present).

Register of interests

Every entry the member has in the Register of Members' Financial Interests, as Parliament currently publishes it. The wording and values are the member's own declarations; nothing here has been assessed by this site.

Totals add only the entries that declare an amount received: payments for work, donations, gifts, and funded visits (register categories 1.1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Ongoing employment is listed but not added, because its figure is a rate rather than a sum received. Each entry is dated by when the benefit happened, not when it was registered, and placed under the party the member sat for on that date. A member who changed party therefore has a separate total for each.

DateCategoryEntryDeclared valueSitting forSource
2. Donations and supportAugust Ltd - £9,625.00£9,625LabourRegister record
4. Visits outside the UKInternational visit to Saudi Arabia between 11 October 2025 and 15 October 2025The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia£9,456.85LabourRegister record
8. MiscellaneousMember of the Executive Committee of the British Group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union.—LabourRegister record

Register on Parliament's site

Latest on this tracker 452

  1. ParliamentJohn Slinger

    Budget Resolutions

    I am glad to support this excellent Budget. I welcome and agree with the Chancellor’s praise for his predecessor, my right hon. Friend the Member for Leeds West and Pudsey (Rachel Reeves), whose commitment to secure economic foundations has helped to fund sustained public investment and deliver growth. It has helped the Chancellor rightly to offer breathing space now and fresh hope for the future. I will focus on the latter, but, on breathing space, the Budget delivered, with 41,760 households in my constituency receiving the £100 household energy payment. As someone whose professional career was in the private sector, I was particularly delighted to see the two-year business rate freeze, which will benefit 336 local retail, hospitality and leisure properties in Rugby, Bulkington and the villages. There was much in the Budget, too, on fresh hope for the future. The words of the Prime Minister are important in this context. In his Labour conference speech, he said: “Hope comes from honesty…It comes from saying the things politicians usually avoid.” It is what I call hard-headed hope. We need what I call the responsibility revolution: a focus on what each of us as individuals or organisations should contribute—or indeed sacrifice—rather than on what entitlements we are to receive. We older folk have a responsibility to the next generation, so my speech will focus primarily on the physical embodiment of fresh hope for the future: our young people. There can be no more important long-term issue than their interests. In addressing a long-term challenge for those at the opposite end of the age spectrum, the Prime Minister set out in his Labour conference speech how the Government will adjust the pension triple lock, which is a bold and much-needed move. He also said that “we will need to show the same boldness for our young people, too.” The Budget did that in several ways. I warmly welcome my right hon. Friend the Chancellor’s announcements of the Your First Home equity loan scheme and the first-time buyer ISA. That young people are priced out of affordable housing is a national scandal. Thousands of people in my constituency will also appreciate the much-needed 3.9% increase in the national living and minimum wage. The young entrepreneurs allowance is a vital pro-young people, pro-entrepreneurship measure. Let us encourage young people across the country to consider entrepreneurship as a viable career option. However, we need to go much further to provide hope for the future. We need to keep going until we can truly say that our young people are equipped sufficiently to be the architects of the future rather than tenants in a world designed by the older generation and all too often shaped by their interests. I would like to see the appointment of a Minister for younger and future generations sitting in Cabinet to scrutinise existing and future policy and legislation through the lens of how it benefits the next generation. We also need an independent body to hold the Government’s feet to the fire, so how about an office for intergenerational fairness? Last year, I coined the phrase “youth triple lock” because I wanted to focus attention on young people’s needs and the need for some rebalancing. I suggest an above-inflation increase in the student maintenance loan. The Prime Minister hinted at that in a social media post with the Chancellor when he said that student loans are “one to come back to.” I also suggest free bus passes and something on housing, which, as I stated earlier, was covered extensively by the Chancellor’s excellent Budget. There remains a risk that the social contract with our young people is fraying, so let us show that our Labour Government are not slowing down but accelerating our efforts to empower young people. Our role is not just doing what will make us popular with a plurality of mainly older voters; we need to rebalance things, because investing more in our young people is in the best interests of our economy as they are the innovators, the entrepreneurs, the workers, the business owners, the public servants and much more of tomorrow. We must unleash their potential. More importantly, it is the moral thing to do; it is the fair thing to do; it is the Labour thing to do. I commend the Budget for all its measures, and in particular those regarding young people. As ever, measures to empower young people are a down payment on the future and, as with all healthy investments, regular, judicious and generous investment pays dividends in the long run. I hope that the 10-year plan will be another opportunity to demonstrate that to the younger generation.

    Hansard source
  2. ParliamentJohn Slinger

    Budget Resolutions

    The right hon. and learned Lady, speaking about apprenticeships, has essentially said that nothing has been done. Does she acknowledge that my right hon. Friend the Chancellor, in his Budget speech, specifically spoke about how “Today’s Budget provides £100 million for a local apprenticeship service to match young people with local firms, funded from savings in welfare fraud and error”?<span id="vol792_col311" class="cross-reference" data-house-id="1" data-column-number="311" data-volume-number="792" data-external-id="F5B77951-C068-4E8E-8957-07FFEF97C2E1">—[Official Report, 28 October 2026; Vol. 792, c. 311.]</span>

    Hansard source
  3. ParliamentJohn Slinger

    Community Transport Services: Minibus Drivers

    I commend the hon. Gentleman for bringing this important debate to the Chamber. I am listening intently to what he is saying and will listen intently to the Minister. I have seen at first hand the Volunteer Friends charity in my constituency, which runs a medicar transport service and supported shopping service. The issues that he has raised show how there are problems in the sector and how we need to do everything we possibly can to facilitate people to volunteer to help the community. I have seen with my own eyes just how important that is.

    Hansard source
  4. ParliamentJohn Slinger

    Social Housing Bill (Third sitting)

    Perhaps the hon. Gentleman was going to come on to this point, but what practical steps would he suggest for his Liberal Democrat local government colleagues? I think it is fair to say that they do not have the greatest reputation for approving housing developments in their areas. He has, admittedly, said that he is more in favour of social home building than private dwellings, but what practical steps would he take to encourage his local government colleagues on his target?

    Hansard source
  5. ParliamentJohn Slinger

    Social Housing Bill (Third sitting)

    I very much like and respect the hon. Gentleman, but does he agree that education and health resources, for example, in towns—where brownfield sites invariably are—are often relatively busy or full up, and face real challenges and pressures? Other conurbations such as villages, which admittedly do not have all the transport links that make town brownfield sites the most prominent in the planning system—let us not forget that they are prioritised by this Government—also need additional housing and social housing. Quite often, when I talk to people in those villages, their pubs and schools are struggling because they do not have enough people who want to use them.

    Hansard source
  6. ParliamentJohn Slinger

    Social Housing Bill (Third sitting)

    Does the hon. Gentleman agree that the need for social homes—and for affordable homes, although we are talking about social homes here—exists not only in our towns, but in our villages? If we are to deal with the long-standing problems with the high cost of homes on the private market, we will need social homes across the range of conurbations in our country.

    Hansard source
  7. ParliamentJohn Slinger

    Social Housing Bill (Fourth sitting)

    On the new clause, I recall the shadow Minister, the hon. Member for Orpington, mentioning the word “prioritise”, “prioritising” or “prioritisation”; perhaps he will intervene if he feels that I am not being accurate. New clause 32, however, is categorical. I have checked the Cambridge dictionary, which defines “prioritise” as: “to decide which of a group of things”— for the purposes of this debate, I will say “people”, rather than “things”— “are the most important so that you can deal with them first.” I emphasise “first”. Perhaps he will explain to me how his use of the word relates to the new clause, which is categorical in stating that someone cannot gain access to social housing unless they are a British citizen. I note that he is not intervening. Other groups of people who live in this country would be affected by the new clause, although I will not rehearse points so ably made by my hon. Friends. Such groups include people under the EU settlement scheme, which was brought in under the previous Conservative Government. The scheme allows people who are not British citizens to live here, and without doubt they contribute hugely to our economy, through taxation and in other ways. Finally, many Gurkhas have proudly served our armed forces. I am sure all hon. Members have met some of them, and we have the utmost respect for them. Often, they struggle to gain indefinite leave to remain, and are not British citizens, so they would also be excluded from social housing under the new clause.

    Hansard source
  8. ParliamentJohn Slinger

    Higher Education Funding

    My hon. Friend is making a very compelling speech. I wonder if he noticed the coverage in <em>The </em><em>Telegraph</em>, which reported that graduates on the minimum wage will be making repayments on three out of the five student loan plans from next year onwards. Does he agree that this, in many ways, breaks our social contract with the student population, who were essentially told that they would earn a huge amount more and should therefore contribute to their higher education?

    Hansard source
  9. ParliamentJohn Slinger

    Social Housing Bill (Second sitting)

    Regarding social landlords reassessing the use of their stock, does the Minister agree that there needs to be more focus on the needs of disabled members of our community? My constituent Keeley Callan came to see me on Friday. She is disabled, and I would argue she is actually disabled by the social housing system because she has been waiting for at least five years to move into her own accommodation. That is totally unacceptable, given her equal rights to housing in law. Will the Minister briefly reflect on that as he sums up?

    Hansard source
  10. ParliamentJohn Slinger

    Domestic Farming and Food Supply

    On imports, the hon. Lady might be touching on one of the really important topics for the farming community, which is the huge power of the supermarket chains in setting prices. Farm-gate prices are clearly making it very difficult for farmers to earn the decent living that they so deserve. Does she agree that the Government should absolutely take on board some of the comments by Baroness Batters on that, and do everything they can to ensure that farmers get a fair price and that competition works not just in the interests of the supermarkets, but in those of our farmers?

    Hansard source

2024 General Election: Rugby

Held . Recorded result: Lab Gain. Majority 4,428. 49,004 votes cast from an electorate of 74,901. Parties are as each candidate stood at the time.

CandidatePartyVotesShare
John SlingerLabour19,53339.9%
Yousef DahmashConservative15,10530.8%
Devenne KedwardReform UK8,22516.8%
Richard DicksonLiberal Democrat3,2526.6%
Becca StevensonGreen Party2,5565.2%
Mark TownsendIndependent2150.4%
Anand SwayamprakasamIndependent1180.2%

Election result on Parliament's site

Parliamentary career

Seats held

SeatDates
RugbyElected 1 time – present

Committee memberships

CommitteeDates
Social Housing Bill [Lords] – present
Courts and Tribunals Bill –
Speaker's Conference (2024) – present

Career on Parliament's site

Published contact details

Parliamentary office

House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA

[email protected]

X (formerly Twitter)

x.com/johnslinger

Only the details Parliament publishes for this member. Contact page on Parliament's site

Profile data retrieved from Parliament on .