Official portrait of Gareth Snell
UK Parliament, CC BY 3.0

Gareth Snell

Labour Party MP for Stoke-on-Trent Central since (elected). An MP continuously since .

Parliament recordVoting recordWritten questionsEarly day motions

Entries on this tracker

557

Each filed under the party they sat for that day

Register entries

6

As currently published

Declared while sitting for Labour

£0

0 of 6 entries state an amount

Party affiliation

PartyOfficeAreaPeriodBeganEndedSource
LabourMPStoke-on-Trent Central – presentelected—Party history

Parliament's party history for this member: Labour ( – present).

Register of interests

Every entry the member has in the Register of Members' Financial Interests, as Parliament currently publishes it. The wording and values are the member's own declarations; nothing here has been assessed by this site.

Totals add only the entries that declare an amount received: payments for work, donations, gifts, and funded visits (register categories 1.1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Ongoing employment is listed but not added, because its figure is a rate rather than a sum received. Each entry is dated by when the benefit happened, not when it was registered, and placed under the party the member sat for on that date. A member who changed party therefore has a separate total for each.

DateCategoryEntryDeclared valueSitting forSource
8. MiscellaneousGovernor, Birches Head Academy. This is an unpaid role.—LabourRegister record
8. MiscellaneousMember, Local Community Committee - Clayton High Academy. This is an unpaid role.—LabourRegister record
8. MiscellaneousBoard Observer, Stoke-on-Trent City Centre Business Improvement District. This is an unpaid role.—LabourRegister record
date registered7. ShareholdingsShares in Clayduck Ltd—LabourRegister record
date registered8. MiscellaneousGovernor, Abbey Hill Academy and College. This is an unpaid role.—LabourRegister record
date registered8. MiscellaneousGovernor, City of Stoke-on-Trent 6th Form College. This is an unpaid role.—LabourRegister record

Register on Parliament's site

Latest on this tracker 557

  1. ParliamentGareth Snell

    Young People and Work: Milburn Interim Report

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms McVey. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Wrexham (Andrew Ranger) for securing this debate. A lot has been said by hon. Members from across the House that I will seek not to repeat, but I would like to push the Minister on a couple of points coming out of the Milburn review. Its diagnosis shines a light on what was known to most of us. Indeed, Stoke-on-Trent has quite often been seen as an exemplar both of where things were terrible and of where things are getting better. Our NEET rate has dropped from 16% to below 10% because of work done by partnerships, but we still have more to do. Part of that is because our local environment has flexed to do what it needs to, sometimes against Ofsted and Government guidelines. I commend to the Minister the work done by the CEO Futures Forum, which brings together multi-academy trusts from across the city to look at the pathways that young people need now for the jobs that will exist in the future, much as my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham Selly Oak (Al Carns) said. We are constrained by the fact that good apprenticeship providers are unable to take on the numbers of young people who want to do apprenticeships, because they are held back by the de minimis rules under the apprenticeship provider and assessment register regulations. I urge the Minister and her Department to look at how, if this is a moral crusade, we can use our entire arsenal to ensure that every young person has the right pathway. If need be, that should include liberalising some of the rules around the registration of apprenticeship providers so that groups such as Dan Canavan’s Spark Group can take on the young people they want. I urge the Minister not to fall back on some of the rudimentary politics that suggests that artificially capping the wages we pay young people, in contrast to the wages we pay a full-time adult, is a way to address the NEET problem. People should be paid fairly for the work they do, regardless of their age or the way they do it. That was a Government manifesto commitment, but the siren voices are calling for it to be slowed down. I urge the Government to resist that as much as they can.

    Hansard source
  2. ParliamentGareth Snell

    Young People and Work: Milburn Interim Report

    The aspiration of work experience is laudable, but the guidance that came out in the recent keeping children safe in education update now requires, if a young person will be spending more than three days in a workplace, that workplace to undergo a Disclosure and Barring Service check, as part of its being an unregulated activity. That is a significant barrier for many small businesses, particularly those that have previously hosted young people, but now have to go through the burden of getting a check. Could the Minister take that back to the Department and work with the Department for Education to find a way of ironing out that kink, so that we keep children safe but do not preclude the opportunities they previously had?

    Hansard source
  3. ParliamentGareth Snell

    Poundland

    (Urgent Question): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade if he will make a statement on the situation at Poundland and potential actions to protect jobs.

    Hansard source
  4. ParliamentGareth Snell

    Poundland

    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for granting this urgent question. I thank the Minister for the tone and content of her answer. At the heart of this matter are the 11,000 people whose jobs, through no fault of their own, hang in the balance, and who do not know whether they will have a job at all this side of Christmas. Those jobs are not concentrated in a big factory, but dispersed across this country in towns such as Hanley in Stoke-on-Trent and in your constituency of Chorley, Mr Speaker, as well as in the supply chains and distributors in Makerfield and Harlow, which my hon. Friend the Member for Harlow (Chris Vince) talked about. This company has survived because the workers turned it around. We are in the situation that we are in today because choices have been made by Gordon Brothers. It has rejected solvent bids and is seeking to push a company into administration for its own personal profit. Fundamentally, its interest does not appear to be the 11,000 constituents we all represent, who take home money to look after their kids, put food on the table and live the life that they deserve. I am very glad that the Minister continues with meetings, but the management of Poundland is not the problem; it is Gordon Brothers. If we get to a point where administration takes place and 11,000 jobs and supply chain jobs are put at risk, what levers can the Minister use to save as many jobs as she can? What pressure can this House, through her, put on the owners to accept one of the solvent bids in order to protect jobs? What can this House do to send a message to Gordon Brothers that its predatory capitalism when it comes to this company will not be tolerated? We in this country will always stand with people before profit.

    Hansard source
  5. ParliamentGareth Snell

    Poundland

    On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. I should have put on record my membership of USDAW at the beginning of the urgent question, and I apologise to the House for inadvertently failing to do so.

    Hansard source
  6. ParliamentGareth Snell

    Draft Housing (Tenancy Deposit Schemes) Order 2026

    I thank the Minister for giving way and for his explanation. Can he at this stage give any indication of the thresholds at which this mechanism would kick in and allow the Department to make those directions? It is perfectly right that a windfall on interest can be put to good public use, but I am interested in where the Department currently considers the threshold for that windfall to start, so that we can know when those schemes might start making a contribution.

    Hansard source
  7. ParliamentGareth Snell

    Immigration: Earned Settlement

    Will the Home Secretary set out what internal changes she will make in the Home Office? One complaint I often get from people waiting for their ILR decision is about the length of time it takes to get that outcome from the point of application. As part of this new package to improve the system, what will happen to reduce the waiting time for applicants?

    Hansard source
  8. ParliamentGareth Snell

    Budget Resolutions and Economic Situation

    Given that he raised the issue, could the hon. Gentleman set out by how much he thinks the minimum wage should be cut?

    Hansard source
  9. ParliamentGareth Snell

    Jobs and Employment: Staffordshire

    It is not just about the young people; it is also about the adult reskilling opportunities. The Chancellor’s announcement of the union learning fund was incredibly welcome, but with an ageing workforce in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent, and with technological advances often outpacing the skills of the people already in work, we must make sure we keep those people who are in jobs trained to the level that means that they can carry on working. If the Minister could respond to that, I would be very grateful.

    Hansard source
  10. ParliamentGareth Snell

    Jobs and Employment: Staffordshire

    I have spoken to the Minister about this issue before, and I have spoken to the Minister for Skills in the other place as well, but the DWP could help to move this forward by looking at the restrictions on apprenticeship provider and assessment register registrations for new apprenticeship providers, and by changing the £100,000 de minimis for subcontracting. There are companies and employers in Stoke that want to take on apprentices but cannot do so because the contracts are already at the limit. If the DWP could look at that, we could revolutionise apprenticeship providers in the county.

    Hansard source

2024 General Election: Stoke-on-Trent Central

Held . Recorded result: Lab Gain. Majority 6,409. 35,289 votes cast from an electorate of 73,812. Parties are as each candidate stood at the time.

CandidatePartyVotesShare
Gareth SnellLabour14,95042.4%
Luke ShentonReform UK8,54124.2%
Chandra KannegantiConservative6,22117.6%
Navid KaleemIndependent2,2816.5%
Adam ColcloughGreen Party1,7034.8%
Laura McCarthyLiberal Democrat9992.8%
Andy PoleshawIndependent3150.9%
AliRom AliromIndependent2790.8%

Election result on Parliament's site

Parliamentary career

Seats held

SeatDates
Stoke-on-Trent CentralElected 1 time – present
Stoke-on-Trent CentralElected 2 times –
Committee memberships 9
CommitteeDates
Secure 16 to 19 Academies Bill – present
Secure 16 to 19 Academies Bill –
Statutory Instruments (Joint Committee) – present
Statutory Instruments (Select Committee) – present
Committee of Privileges – present
Committee on Standards – present
Procedure Committee –
Public Accounts Committee –
Science and Technology Committee (Commons) –

Elections contested without winning

ConstituencyDate
Stoke-on-Trent Central

Career on Parliament's site

Published contact details

Parliamentary office

House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA

[email protected]

Constituency office

Constituency office

01782 971949

Only the details Parliament publishes for this member. Contact page on Parliament's site

Profile data retrieved from Parliament on .