Official portrait of Dr Beccy Cooper
UK Parliament, CC BY 3.0

Dr Beccy Cooper

Labour Party MP for Worthing West since (elected). An MP continuously since .

Parliament recordVoting recordWritten questionsEarly day motions

Entries on this tracker

122

Each filed under the party they sat for that day

Register entries

11

As currently published

Declared while sitting for Labour

£22,359.31

6 of 11 entries state an amount

Party affiliation

PartyOfficeAreaPeriodBeganEndedSource
LabourMPWorthing West – presentelected—Party history

Parliament's party history for this member: Labour ( – present).

Register of interests

Every entry the member has in the Register of Members' Financial Interests, as Parliament currently publishes it. The wording and values are the member's own declarations; nothing here has been assessed by this site.

Totals add only the entries that declare an amount received: payments for work, donations, gifts, and funded visits (register categories 1.1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Ongoing employment is listed but not added, because its figure is a rate rather than a sum received. Each entry is dated by when the benefit happened, not when it was registered, and placed under the party the member sat for on that date. A member who changed party therefore has a separate total for each.

DateCategoryEntryDeclared valueSitting forSource
4. Visits outside the UKInternational visit to Uganda between 27 July 2026 and 31 July 2026Global Health Partnerships£2,143.50LabourRegister record
2. Donations and supportAid Alliance - £5,010.00£5,010LabourRegister record
8. MiscellaneousUnpaid Trustee of charity Action on Gambling (registered charity 1217653).—LabourRegister record
2. Donations and supportAid Alliance - £1,860.00£1,860LabourRegister record
8. MiscellaneousTreasurer and Member of Executive Committee of Tribune Group of Labour MPs. This is an unpaid role.—LabourRegister record
4. Visits outside the UKInternational visit to Kenya between 12 October 2025 and 17 October 2025Global Health Partnerships£2,337.32LabourRegister record
4. Visits outside the UKInternational visit to Switzerland between 08 October 2025 and 09 October 2025Results UK£849.77LabourRegister record
2. Donations and supportThe British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy - £10,158.72£10,158.72LabourRegister record
date registered8. MiscellaneousFellow of the Faculty of Public Health.—LabourRegister record
date registered8. MiscellaneousMembership of the British Medical Association.—LabourRegister record
date registered8. MiscellaneousTrustee of the Royal Society of Public Health. This is an unpaid role.—LabourRegister record

Register on Parliament's site

Latest on this tracker 122

  1. ParliamentDr Beccy Cooper

    Covid-19 Inquiry Module 4 Report: Government Response

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Stuart. I thank the hon. Member for Christchurch (Sir Christopher Chope) for securing this important debate. He focused on one particular aspect of module 4 on vaccines and therapeutics: the recompense scheme. I would like to broaden the conversation slightly. Alongside the learnings, the module contains a lot of positive narrative. As a public health consultant who worked during the pandemic, both here and with public health partners in other countries, I want to recognise the huge public value of the UK’s sustained investment in our NHS, public health and scientific research. Thanks to that investment, capabilities were in place prior to the pandemic that meant the UK was in a position to authorise and begin delivering effective covid-19 vaccines within a year of the first identified UK case. By September 2022, more than 150 million doses of the three principal vaccines had been administered in the UK, including the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, which was developed here in the UK thanks to years of scientific research. That research capacity is part of a wider global partnership that allows us to ensure that vaccine development can be undertaken swiftly and accurately, both during a pandemic and for other essential vaccinations, such as our flu response. I want to mention the Centre for Epidemic Response and Innovation in South Africa. It is a key partner, which identified the omicron variant during the pandemic, and it is now critical in identifying influenza strains for the development of our influenza vaccination programme every year. It would be good to hear from the Minister a little more about how we are continuing to build the international scientific partnership for vaccine development and pandemic preparedness, particularly in respect of the 100-day mission, where we aim to work with global partners to make safe, effective and affordable diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines available within just 100 days of identifying a future pandemic threat. As well as the importance of ensuring that we have the capacity to develop vaccines swiftly and efficiently as part of a global response, the module highlighted the issue of equitable access to vaccines, and the role that existing health inequalities played in UK vaccination <span id="121WH" class="column-number" data-column-number="121WH"></span>coverage. The inquiry identified familiar themes regarding the reasons for lower uptake of the vaccine in some communities and groups of people. As the inquiry rightly highlighted, vaccine inequality is not simply an issue of individual behaviour; it is also a reflection of how services are designed, how communities experience public institutions and whether the health system can meet people where they are in their daily lives. There is also the issue of public trust in the system that is administering the vaccines. It should be noted that that cannot simply be manufactured through a national communication campaign at the moment of crisis; it must be earned over time through reliable services, honest information and meaningful relationships with communities. There is a useful distinction to be made between legitimate questions about vaccine safety and deliberate misinformation. We need to engage with this area proactively and positively, allow people to have their voices heard and ensure that all available facts and evidence are clearly communicated. Will the Minister please update us on how lessons learned from vaccine hesitancy and the health inequality patterns that were observed during the pandemic are now being used to inform our UK vaccination strategy, particularly in the light of worrying recent patterns in childhood vaccination for diseases such as measles and the dropping of the explicit World Health Organisation target of 95% coverage that was put in place to ensure population herd immunity? Finally, I want to acknowledge my public health, clinical and care colleagues who contributed so much to the pandemic response, some of whom tragically gave their lives in order to care for other people. Directors of public health, local authorities, primary care and community organisations should remain a central part of the solution to ensuring vaccine equity. We must ensure that the lessons learned from the inquiry allow us to support their essential work, so that we can respond swiftly to the next pandemic.

    Hansard source
  2. ParliamentDr Beccy Cooper

    NHS Corridor Care

    I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Tooting (Dr Allin-Khan) for bringing this timely and important debate to the Chamber. As we have heard, corridor care is one of the clearest signs of wider pressures across urgent and emergency care services, including rising demand, delayed discharge and constrained hospital capacity. As so much has already been said, I want to focus my remarks on a couple of areas. As an MP for a coastal community, I want to make it clear to the Minister that when we are looking at these pressures, we need to acknowledge the additional pressures facing specific communities. Coastal communities tend to have older populations and poorer health outcomes. Worthing West sits within one of England’s coastal communities. Its population is older than average—even though I am not older than average—frailty is increasing, multiple long-term conditions are common, emergency admissions are correspondingly higher, recruitment is harder and deprivation exists alongside affluence. All these things contribute to the pressures that we have discussed during the debate. University Hospitals Sussex NHS foundation trust is in my constituency. As we have discussed, NHS England’s data is not completely useful in many instances, but it is the best that we have. I have had a look and, on average, the four emergency departments in the trust are seeing 65 patients in their emergency department corridor care service each day. In their general and acute wards, they have corridor care for 39 patients each day. That is not insubstantial. We have talked about the back door, but I really want to talk about the front door. Members will be unsurprised to hear that, as a public health doctor, I know that prevention is a corridor care policy. The Government need to ensure that investment in prevention and public health is recognised as part of the solution to reducing corridor care. We have to reduce the flow of avoidable illness into our hospitals in the first place, and that means tackling smoking, poor housing, air pollution, obesity, loneliness, poverty and delayed access to community care. Corridor care begins long before a patient reaches an accident and emergency department.

    Hansard source
  3. ParliamentDr Beccy Cooper

    NHS Corridor Care

    I thank my hon. Friend for those excellent remarks, and I agree wholeheartedly. As I have said, corridor care is a symptom, and our challenge is to identify the underlying causes, rather than simply measure the symptoms. It is what happens when demand, delayed discharge, workforce shortages, social care pressures and preventable ill health collide in one place. Stakeholders that I speak to—and, I am sure, stakeholders that colleagues across the House speak to—repeatedly call for public health investment, stronger community services, social care capacity and the prevention of avoidable admissions. Every prevented stroke, every smoking cessation intervention, every warm home, every child who grows up healthier and every patient supported earlier in the community means one less avoidable admission to an already overcrowded emergency department, such as that of my hon. Friend the Member for Tooting.

    Hansard source
  4. ParliamentDr Beccy Cooper

    UK Aid Policy: Global Funding Trends

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Efford. We meet at a moment when the global aid system is under extraordinary pressure. I thank the right hon. Member for Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale (David Mundell) for securing this incredibly important debate. Current projections suggest that cuts to international aid could contribute to as many as 14 million additional deaths by 2030, including 4.5 million children under the age of five. That is the human cost of dismantling the world aid architecture at speed. The United Kingdom is not alone in reducing aid spending—the United States, France, Germany and Canada are all scaling back their commitments—but that does not make our choices less significant; it makes them more significant. When every major donor retreats at the same time, there is no one left to step into the gap, and yet the challenges we face today do not stop at national borders. Conflict, climate change, forced displacement, pandemics and antimicrobial resistance affect us all. Investment overseas is increasingly an investment in our own security and prosperity here at home.<span id="50WH" class="column-number" data-column-number="50WH"></span> Global health provides perhaps the clearest example of why this matters. Viruses do not stop at passport control. The first line of defence against the next pandemic is not at Heathrow or Dover, it is in strong public health systems thousands of miles away. Our national health service and the health security of people across Britain depend on a global health system that works effectively for everyone. That is why I welcome aspects of the Government’s approach. I welcome the decision to provide protection for key multilateral health organisations, and I am proud that the UK has made ambitious commitments to the Global Fund and to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance—institutions with a proven ability to deliver vaccines at scale and to reach communities that fragmented programmes often cannot. The Government are also right to recognise that countries want autonomy, not dependency, and that our role should be to help to build resilient health systems that countries themselves can sustain and own. That is the right long-term objective.

    Hansard source
  5. ParliamentDr Beccy Cooper

    UK Aid Policy: Global Funding Trends

    I agree 100%. My hon. Friend the Member for Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme (Lee Pitcher) has already talked about his role in the water, sanitation and hygiene all-party parliamentary group. Access to water is an absolutely essential health determinant. Partnership and resilience building are incredibly important, but they cannot be the whole answer. A strategy designed to strengthen systems over many years does little for a clinic that is closing next month. Communities facing the loss of essential services are not reassured by a long-term theory of change, much as we love that in the development arena. They are worried about whether medicines will be available, whether healthcare workers will be paid and whether the lights will stay on. Withdrawal is fast, capacity building is slow, and people are falling through that gap. That is why, to be honest, the decision to withdraw support from the Global Polio Eradication Initiative and the Pandemic Fund is really quite disappointing. The Government’s own impact assessment warns that these choices increase the risk of disease outbreaks. We are closer than ever to eradicating polio, a disease that has blighted generations of children, and yet, potentially because of cuts to official development assistance, we are stepping back from that goal. I urge us not to. I am equally concerned about the dismantling of the Fleming Fund. Antimicrobial resistance may sound a little abstract, but it is not a distant or theoretical threat. Just ask anybody what they think will happen if their antibiotics do not work when they need them. It is one of the most pressing public health challenges that we face. The effectiveness of antibiotics underpins modern medicine and protects countless lives every day. Our NHS depends on those medicines continuing to work. Recent outbreaks of serious infectious diseases remind us just how much rests upon them.<span id="51WH" class="column-number" data-column-number="51WH"></span> As we have just been reminded, health does not exist in isolation. Clean water, good nutrition and quality education are health interventions by another name. For example, children whose mothers have received a secondary education are far more likely to be fully vaccinated. Although I welcome the prioritisation of healthcare spending, we cannot ignore the reality that in practice many of the programmes being cut are health programmes, too. Nowhere is that more evident than in Africa. The continent bears about a quarter of the world’s disease burden while possessing only 3% of the global health workforce, yet bilateral aid to Africa is facing a 56% reduction—the steepest regional cut across the entire ODA budget. Multilateral institutions will of course continue to play an essential role, but we should not be so naive as to believe that they can absorb cuts of that scale without consequences. The consequences are already becoming clear. In Malawi, an estimated 250,000 adolescents could lose access to family planning services each year. In Somalia, fewer women, girls and boys will be able to access lifesaving healthcare because of these decisions. Behind every statistic is a human being whose opportunities, health and future are being diminished. There is also a broader question of fairness. The NHS benefits enormously from healthcare workers who trained overseas before coming here to serve patients across the United Kingdom, which we sometimes forget in our conversations about immigration. It has been estimated that the UK has saved about £14 billion by relying on health professionals educated and trained elsewhere, and many of the countries from which those workers come are themselves grappling with fragile and understaffed health systems. That is not a windfall; it creates a responsibility. We have a duty to invest back into the health systems from which we have drawn so much expertise, not to withdraw support at the very moment that those systems are under increasing strain. The lessons of Ebola, covid-19 and antimicrobial resistance are ultimately the same: we cannot isolate ourselves from global threats, and the cheapest crisis is the one that we prevent. Ministers have described these decisions as exceptional measures taken in difficult fiscal circumstances. I recognise those pressures, but we have a responsibility to keep people safe, including people here in the United Kingdom. We are weakening the protection of some of the world’s most vulnerable communities, and in doing so we are undermining our own health security here in Britain. For those reasons, I urge my Government to look again. We need a credible, serious and urgent plan to restore aid spending, not only because it is the right thing to do but because it is in our national interest.

    Hansard source
  6. ParliamentDr Beccy Cooper

    Engagements

    <Question HRSContentId="{AABDE36A-55A9-4811-96EA-1A3E6D0F969E}">Q7. <QuestionText HRSContentId="{8BE638EB-9138-41D9-973E-98C5A7A7A5EA}"></QuestionText>It is great to see the NHS moving forward, with a reduction in waiting lists and improving relations with our junior doctors, my colleagues. However, in order to keep our NHS working well in the long term, we must get serious about prevention. Every year, more than 30,000 deaths in our country are attributed to poor air quality. Ella Kissi-Debrah’s mum knows this all too well; her little girl was just nine years old when she died as a direct result of air pollution. Seventy years on from the Clean Air Act 1956, will the Deputy Prime Minister support a much-needed update to this essential law, to protect the future of our NHS and to keep our children healthy?</Question>

    Hansard source
  7. ParliamentDr Beccy Cooper

    Ebola Outbreaks

    <Question HRSContentId="{FA1E34BB-E221-4C3E-A1D3-2B078C6756EC}">8. <QuestionText HRSContentId="{9BDD2FF0-F2A9-40DD-A3EE-8C5FF6761ACD}">What assessment she has made of the potential implications for her Department’s policies of international outbreaks of Ebola.</QuestionText> </Question>

    Hansard source
  8. ParliamentDr Beccy Cooper

    Ebola Outbreaks

    The Ebola outbreak now spans 29 health zones across three eastern provinces and is a reminder to us all that infectious diseases do not respect borders. With global health funding under significant pressure, does the Minister share my concern that we risk undermining the early warning systems that ultimately protect people here at home? Can he set out what steps the UK is taking to maintain its leadership role in global security?

    Hansard source
  9. ParliamentDr Beccy Cooper

    National Planning Policy Framework: Proposed Health Inequality Duty

    <Question HRSContentId="{F8582823-38D8-4264-9FBE-78D05B80293D}">4. <QuestionText HRSContentId="{EB95CDC1-B0E3-4636-A668-EB82A05D6AAD}">What assessment he has made of the potential merits of adding a health inequality duty to the national planning policy framework.</QuestionText> </Question>

    Hansard source
  10. ParliamentDr Beccy Cooper

    National Planning Policy Framework: Proposed Health Inequality Duty

    Health inequalities are driven by social determinants such as access to green spaces, which is directly associated with higher life expectancy. In my constituency of Worthing West, we have the lowest amount of green space per person in the country—less than a snooker table. Could the Minister set out how the Department is working across Government to ensure that this essential health determinant is being secured and increased across all areas of our country?

    Hansard source

2024 General Election: Worthing West

Held . Recorded result: Lab Gain. Majority 3,949. 50,997 votes cast from an electorate of 77,039. Parties are as each candidate stood at the time.

CandidatePartyVotesShare
Beccy CooperLabour20,51940.2%
Peter BottomleyConservative16,57032.5%
Edmund RookeReform UK7,56214.8%
Sonya MallinGreen Party3,2746.4%
Morag ChuggLiberal Democrat2,7085.3%
Kathryn AttwoodIndependent3640.7%

Election result on Parliament's site

Parliamentary career

Seats held

SeatDates
Worthing WestElected 1 time – present

Committee memberships

CommitteeDates
Tobacco and Vapes Bill –
Health and Social Care Committee –

Career on Parliament's site

Published contact details

Parliamentary office

House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA

[email protected]

Constituency office

Constituency office

[email protected]

Only the details Parliament publishes for this member. Contact page on Parliament's site

Profile data retrieved from Parliament on .