Official portrait of Claire Hazelgrove
UK Parliament, CC BY 3.0

Claire Hazelgrove

Labour Party MP for Filton and Bradley Stoke since (elected). An MP continuously since .

Parliament recordVoting recordWritten questionsEarly day motions

Entries on this tracker

63

Each filed under the party they sat for that day

Register entries

3

As currently published

Declared while sitting for Labour

£0

0 of 3 entries state an amount

Party affiliation

PartyOfficeAreaPeriodBeganEndedSource
LabourMPFilton and Bradley Stoke – presentelected—Party history

Parliament's party history for this member: Labour ( – present).

Register of interests

Every entry the member has in the Register of Members' Financial Interests, as Parliament currently publishes it. The wording and values are the member's own declarations; nothing here has been assessed by this site.

Totals add only the entries that declare an amount received: payments for work, donations, gifts, and funded visits (register categories 1.1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Ongoing employment is listed but not added, because its figure is a rate rather than a sum received. Each entry is dated by when the benefit happened, not when it was registered, and placed under the party the member sat for on that date. A member who changed party therefore has a separate total for each.

DateCategoryEntryDeclared valueSitting forSource
date registered8. MiscellaneousA Fellow of Radix, a think tank for the radical centre.—LabourRegister record
date registered8. MiscellaneousTrustee of the Foundation for Active Community Engagement (FACE). This is an unpaid role.—LabourRegister record
date registered8. MiscellaneousTrustee of Girlguiding Bristol and South Gloucestershire. This is an unpaid role.—LabourRegister record

Register on Parliament's site

Latest on this tracker 63

  1. ParliamentClaire Hazelgrove

    Poundland

    Let me first declare an interest as a proud member of USDAW. I share the support for valued Poundland workers across the country at this time of great uncertainty for them, including those in the Emersons Green branch in my constituency. Local people work hard, day in day out, for this profitable company, and deserve so much better than the worry of possible job losses that are no fault of their own, but the result of inaction on the part of the owners. What reassurance can the Minister give me, and those valued local workers, that the Government are doing all they can now, and will review regulations and processes to establish whether poor owner behaviour can be further protected against in future?

    Hansard source
  2. ParliamentClaire Hazelgrove

    Social Media: Ban for Under-16s

    I declare an interest as the proud patron of local youth charity, the Foundation for Active Community Engagement, which co-hosted my “Coffee with Claire” event, listening to young people and those of all ages across my community. I ran that event, along with an online survey, to listen to people, including young people, about their experiences and views. Does my hon. and learned Friend agree that it is important that, when we look at these regulations, we make sure we avoid cliff edges—where young people might be completely cut off from social media and then exposed to it all on one day? There is a possibility, as we look at lowering the voting age, that some people’s first day of accessing social media could also be the day that they cast their first vote.

    Hansard source
  3. ParliamentClaire Hazelgrove

    Performance of Royal Mail

    I draw the House’s attention to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests regarding the CWU. On that precise point, does the hon. Gentleman agree that this really is not the fault of our dedicated postal workers? In fact, it is a real loss across the country, and certainly in my constituency, to see many dedicated and long-serving postal workers stepping away from roles that they have held for decades because of the uncertainty and the workload that they face.

    Hansard source
  4. ParliamentClaire Hazelgrove

    Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

    Today I am going to share the most personal of stories publicly for the first time, and I ask for the kindness of colleagues in not intervening so that I can. Last October, my mum, Ruth Hazelgrove, chose to bring her late-stage terminal illness to an end, on her terms, at home, with dignity and with a strength that I can only try to imagine. Mum had just turned 61. She had endured significant health challenges for almost half her life. When mum was 32, she was diagnosed with a rare blood cancer, polycythaemia vera. Thankfully, she was able to see us grow up and meet her grandchildren. Mum loved life and laughter, and our family will remember her this way. In early 2024, mum was told that her condition had taken a significant turn. That autumn, while we debated the initial version of this Bill, her pain was excruciating. She had access to good palliative care, but what we learned the hardest of ways is that not all pain can be palliated. I will never forget seeing her writhing and screaming in pain, at points for weeks. None of us will. I know of no deity that would want that. Eventually, some medication helped her leave hospital, but it then became less effective over time. For mum, it was not a choice of life or death; it was a question of what kind of death she would have. She was clear that she did not want a painful or undignified death. She wanted peace. For us, it will always be a tremendous personal sadness that the current law meant that she could not tell us her plan, and we could not say goodbye to her—but more importantly than that, that she could not say goodbye at the end of her life, or be surrounded by her loved ones, which is what she would have wanted for her death. Instead, the harmful status quo meant that mum died alone, with photos of us around her. This was 11 months ago either today or tomorrow—we will never know whether <span id="1331" class="column-number" data-column-number="1331"></span>she died late one evening or early the next morning, or whether we are ever marking the anniversary on the right day. This is the status quo. This needs to change. That is why our vote today and our work on this issue is so important now. People with terminal illnesses, and those who will be diagnosed with them soon, matter greatly. If we were again to leave this issue to another Parliament, it would be too late for other people with terminal illnesses who want this provision, but instead face the same impossible bind as my mum; they would continue to face it well into the 2030s, at best. An excruciating death or dying alone is simply not an acceptable bind for a human being. To allow choice does not impose an outcome, but to continue to restrict it does. In part of mum’s last note to us, which is why I am speaking today, she wrote, “I wish the Assisted Dying Bill would have come into force in my lifetime…Maybe there will be hope for others in the future.” Ultimately, is it not what Parliament is for to provide safeguards and freedom? I believe that we are here not to dictate how people live their lives and their deaths, but to enable safe individual choice. Today’s vote is on whether we should continue to work on this, or not at all. I ask right hon. and hon. Members to ask themselves if they feel that this impact of the status quo is right, is just. My hope, and I know my mum’s hope, is that her story can help us choose to end this harmful status quo and see terminally ill adults finally have true choice over their lives and their deaths.

    Hansard source
  5. ParliamentClaire Hazelgrove

    Business Rates: Hospitality Sector

    <Question HRSContentId="{160861F7-33D0-4AE3-BADE-F8F80173209C}">3. <QuestionText HRSContentId="{73B42AD7-BE85-4B9F-9518-7A957FE6C5B7}">What discussions he has had with representatives of pubs on the potential impact of business rates relief on the hospitality sector. </QuestionText></Question>

    Hansard source
  6. ParliamentClaire Hazelgrove

    Business Rates: Hospitality Sector

    My first job was as a pot washer and waitress in a pub at the age of 14. Today, pubs help me to bring fellow residents together for my pub politics events across the constituency. I know how much our pubs mean to us locally, and I warmly welcome further support for them. Will the Minister set out how that support will help to give pubs and the wider sector the certainty they need so that they and the great jobs they provide are here for generations to come?

    Hansard source
  7. ParliamentClaire Hazelgrove

    Business of the House

    Thank you very much, Madam Deputy Speaker. The summer is a great time for families to create lasting memories, but it can also be an expensive time. Locally, I am hosting a free community advice drop-in event, bringing together local advice organisations. Fellow residents can come by to find out more about support that they may be entitled to around energy and water costs, debt advice and more. Will the Leader of the House join me in encouraging anyone who may need support across the Filton and Bradley Stoke constituency to come by, and in thanking everybody involved in providing local support?

    Hansard source
  8. ParliamentClaire Hazelgrove

    Topical Questions

    I am so proud to back Filton’s bid to become the UK town of culture 2028. From our vibrant community to our vast heritage, including as the British home of Concorde, we have so much to offer the whole country. Will the Minister agree to meet me to hear more about this bid and what makes Filton so special?

    Hansard source
  9. ParliamentClaire Hazelgrove

    Defence Investment Plan

    As the Minister will know from his many welcome visits to my constituency, my community is proudly home to MOD Abbey Wood, the centre of Defence Equipment and Support, and many brilliant defence companies of a wide range of sizes. Will he please tell us how he expects the defence investment plan to support important businesses like those?

    Hansard source
  10. ParliamentClaire Hazelgrove

    NHS Dentistry

    I was interested to hear about the hon. Member’s local survey. Ahead of the general election, around 65% of respondents to my survey in Filton and Bradley Stoke reported that the reason why they do not have an NHS dentist is that theirs went private. Does he agree that it would be helpful if the Minister could provide an update on the incentives for keeping more dentists in the NHS?

    Hansard source

2024 General Election: Filton and Bradley Stoke

Held . Recorded result: Lab Gain. Majority 10,000. 50,367 votes cast from an electorate of 77,582. Parties are as each candidate stood at the time.

CandidatePartyVotesShare
Claire HazelgroveLabour22,90545.5%
Jack LoprestiConservative12,90525.6%
Stephen BurgeReform UK6,81913.5%
James NelsonGreen Party4,1428.2%
Benet AllenLiberal Democrat3,5967.1%

Election result on Parliament's site

Parliamentary career

Seats held

SeatDates
Filton and Bradley StokeElected 1 time – present

Committee memberships

CommitteeDates
Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL] –
Foreign Affairs Committee –
Renters’ Rights Bill –

Career on Parliament's site

Published contact details

Parliamentary office

House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA

[email protected]

Only the details Parliament publishes for this member. Contact page on Parliament's site

Profile data retrieved from Parliament on .