Conservative and Unionist Party: a sourced timeline of public activity, with filters by source type and a sidebar of tracked totals

Conservative and Unionist Party

5,731 spoken contributions under 12 words (interjections such as “Will the hon. Member give way?”) are hidden. Show them

  1. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response Update

    Order. Let us keep our questions short and omit the word “you” because I am not responding.

    Hansard source
  2. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response Update

    The Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister’s responsibilities are just growing and growing!

    Hansard source
  3. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Points of Order

    The right hon. Member has got his point on the record. Unfortunately, I am not responsible for the content of Ministers’ speeches, let alone the answers—if only we were. We do not want to continue this debate, but that point is, no doubt, now on the record.

    Hansard source
  4. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Points of Order

    The Chair has no power to compel the Government to produce amendments earlier than the tabling deadline set out in the Standing Orders. However, those on the Treasury Bench will have heard the hon. Member’s comments. When we consider the carry-over motion later—there is some time for that—he will have a chance to raise the matter with the Secretary of State, who will no doubt be back in the Chamber.

    Hansard source
  5. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Points of Order

    The hon. Member is a very professional Member of Parliament, and will no doubt know which other avenues he can take to get the answer. Unfortunately, I am not responsible for the answers that Ministers give here in the Chamber, but he will no doubt use every opportunity to hold the Minister to account.

    Hansard source
  6. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Points of Order

    I thank the right hon. Member for his point of order. The Government’s decision on whether to undertake an inquiry on the subject is not a matter for the Chair. However, his comments will have been heard by the Front-Bench team, and they will take action, if they wish to.

    Hansard source
  7. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Points of Order

    I thank the right hon. Member for his point of order, and for raising this very serious matter. It would not be appropriate to discuss publicly the details of preventive action, and of how Members are supported to protect themselves against these kinds of cyber-threats. If Members would like security advice on how to make personal accounts and devices more resilient, they should contact the Parliamentary Security Department. For matters relating to parliamentary accounts or equipment, Members should contact the Parliamentary Digital Service through the PDS service desk.

    Hansard source
  8. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill

    I confirm that nothing in the Lords message engages Commons financial privilege. Clause 2 Areas of competence

    Hansard source
  9. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill

    With this it will be convenient to discuss the following Government motions: That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendments 89B and 89C. That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendments 36, 90 and 155, insists on its amendments 155A to 155F to the words restored to the Bill by that disagreement with Amendment 155, and proposes further Amendment (a) to the words so restored to the Bill by that disagreement. That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendments 37 and 91, does not insist on its amendment 37A in lieu, and proposes Amendments (a) to (c) to the Bill in lieu of those amendments. That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendments 94B and 94C. That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendments 85 and 86, 97 to 116, 120, 121 and 123 but proposes Amendments (a) to (h) to the Bill in lieu of those amendments.

    Hansard source
  10. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill

    It would be interesting to know the timings of the shadow Minister’s marathon.

    Hansard source
  11. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill

    I encourage Members to ensure that their contributions are linked to the amendments that are in front of us.

    Hansard source
  12. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill

    Order. I am aware that Members wish to make stellar contributions on behalf of their constituencies, but I do not believe that we are discussing Cornish devolution right now. Let us keep the debate in scope of the amendments in front of us.

    Hansard source
  13. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill

    So long as you are referencing the amendment to which you are speaking, then of course—the Floor is yours.

    Hansard source
  14. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Pension Schemes Bill

    Financial privilege is not engaged by any of the items in the Lords message relating to the Bill. Clause 40 Certain schemes providing money purchase benefits: scale and asset allocation

    Hansard source
  15. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

    I can inform the House that Lords amendment 38X engages Commons financial privilege. If the Lords amendment is agreed to, I will cause the customary entry waiving Commons financial privilege to be entered in the Journal. After Clause 26 Power to require internet service providers to prevent or restrict access by children to internet services

    Hansard source
  16. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

    With this it will be convenient to consider the following Government motion: That this House agrees with the Lords in their Amendment 105C.

    Hansard source
  17. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

    Order. I have not spoken about swift action. Would the hon. Member like to make another short intervention appropriately?

    Hansard source
  18. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

    I remind Back-Bench colleagues who wish to contribute that their contributions must relate to the amendments in front of us.

    Hansard source
  19. ParliamentMs Nusrat Ghani

    Ernest Bevin

    I call the Minister to continue to elevate the quality of the debate.

    Hansard source
  20. ParliamentMr Peter Bedford

    Apprenticeships

    With the number of young people not in education, employment or training hovering at the 1 million mark, apprenticeships now more than ever are key to supporting opportunity and aspiration for so many of our young people. Conservative Members fundamentally believe that the best path out of poverty is being in work and contributing to society, with all the economic freedoms that a job brings. Given that the number of apprenticeships in the Secretary of State’s own Department dropped from 5,000 in 2024 to 3,500 in 2025, is it not the case that the Government’s message to business is, “Do as we say, but not as we do”?

    Hansard source
  21. ParliamentMr Mark Francois

    Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

    May I take this opportunity to congratulate my right hon. Friend and Lord Nash on a hard-fought but important campaign? We now have a commitment in principle from the Government that they will ban the use of social media by under-16s, which will be welcomed across the country by concerned parents. Can she reassure me and the House that all that fighting was worth it?

    Hansard source
  22. ParliamentMr Louie French

    Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response Update

    When he was asked on 20 April why there is no record of his and Peter Mandelson’s meeting with Palantir in Washington, the Prime Minister said: “That was a routine meeting in the course of a visit I was on in the US.”—[Official Report, 20 April 2026; Vol. 784, c. 62.] Does the Minister agree that that was a routine meeting, and if so, where is the record of it, as required by the ministerial code?

    Hansard source
  23. ParliamentMr Louie French

    English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill

    The point that my hon. Friend is making is a very accurate description of what is happening in my local area of Bexley, where developers are trying to argue that greenfield sites are now ripe for development because of the Government’s planning changes. Does he share my concern that the Government are continuing to try to barge those changes through this House, and that both Reform and Labour support the Government’s position on the grey belt, which will have a detrimental effect on our local community and our natural environment?

    Hansard source
  24. ParliamentMr Gagan Mohindra

    Topical Questions

    Earlier this year, I visited the High Speed 2 site in my constituency, where I had the privilege of speaking with several apprentices about the value of educational opportunities that offer a clear path into work. Given that there are nearly 1 million people not in education, employment or training, will the Minister outline what steps the Department is taking to promote such apprenticeship schemes?

    Hansard source
  25. ParliamentMr Andrew Snowden

    Unemployment

    11. What assessment he has made of trends in the level of unemployment.

    Hansard source
  26. ParliamentMr Andrew Snowden

    Unemployment

    Fylde’s stunning coastline and countryside mean that the hospitality, tourism and leisure industry is at the heart of our local economy. But I have met many businesses that, following the changes to national insurance, have let go so many young people from that industry and are simply not taking on new seasonal staff. Could the Secretary of State update the House on the current trends of unemployment among 18 to 24-year-olds?

    Hansard source
  27. ParliamentMark Garnier

    State Pension Age Changes: Compensation

    When his party was in opposition, the Prime Minister promised compensation for WASPI women, but when faced with the economic reality of the costs, he and the Secretary of State chose common sense over ideology. In the spirit of that pragmatism, may I ask the Pensions Minister also to take a sensible, thoughtful approach to mandation powers in the Pension Schemes Bill, and to remove clause 40 altogether?

    Hansard source
  28. ParliamentMark Garnier

    Pension Schemes Bill

    With the greatest respect, the Minister is talking nonsense. At the end of the day, every trustee has a fiduciary duty to get the best return for their members. By putting in these mandation powers, the Government are fundamentally going against the most basic principle of the City of London, which is dictum meum pactum—my word is my bond. The Government entered into a pact with the industry, and they are now reneging on that pact by introducing mandation and not allowing the industry to move things forward. The Government are so wrong on this whole point. The Minister should withdraw the mandation powers and get rid of clause 40.

    Hansard source
  29. ParliamentLincoln Jopp

    Draft Conservation of Habitats and Species (Offshore Wind) (Amendment etc.) Regulations 2026

    As I understand it, the purpose of the regulations is to take a pragmatic approach so that developers can develop inshore and offshore wind more quickly by providing a wider range of compensation. If the Government have a change of heart about the development of Rosebank and Jackdaw, does my hon. Friend expect them to take a similar approach to offshore oil and gas?

    Hansard source
  30. ParliamentLincoln Jopp

    Dunmurry Police Station Attack

    It is hard to believe that it was 34 years ago that one of these proxy bombs was driven into my checkpoint in west Belfast. I remember it like it was yesterday. I agree with the Secretary of State that we must find the perpetrators of this evil act, and I, too, encourage the community to come forward, because that is where the answer lies. Will the Secretary of State ask the Chief Constable how many Police Service of Northern Ireland detectives are allocated to investigating legacy issues, versus those allocated to finding the perpetrators of the Dunmurry police station attack?

    Hansard source
  31. ParliamentLincoln Jopp

    Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response Update

    I thank the Minister for his statement, in which he said that “the Government will not publish information that undermines or threatens our country’s national security or international relations.” My question is: in whose judgment? Ultimately, is that the judgment of an official or of a Minister? If it is that of a Minister, which one?

    Hansard source
  32. ParliamentLincoln Jopp

    Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over)

    My right hon. Friend is incredibly well informed on this subject. In his research, has he found any justification for public money being used in that way?

    Hansard source
  33. ParliamentLewis Cocking

    English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill

    If the Minister reckons that Ministers should not dictate what local government structures should be, will she let areas that have two-tier government, and that want to keep their district councils, keep them? My area does; it wants to keep Conservative-run Broxbourne district council. Why is she mandating that we go to unitary authorities, when she is clearly saying, as a Minister at the Dispatch Box, that she does not want to dictate what local government looks like across the country?

    Hansard source
  34. ParliamentLaura Trott

    Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

    On Friday, after Labour MPs had repeatedly blocked a social media ban for under-16s, we had a new proposal from the Government. It was not a serious response to the issue we are facing. It gave the Government three years to take unspecified action on social media, which was nowhere near good enough. Today, that has changed. We now have a commitment from the Government that they will impose an age restriction for children under 16, which will be in addition to, not instead of any curfews. That is a huge step forward in keeping children safe and in supporting parents in their fight against screens destroying children’s lives. We should remember that at the start of the Bill’s passage 18 months ago, the Government said that a social media ban was not something they were looking at. We have moved so far, and things have only changed because of the unity of those on the Opposition Benches, because of Lord Nash’s brilliant campaign and because of the coalition behind Raise the Age. It is a victory for the teachers and health professionals who have constantly made the arguments, and it has happened because of the voices of brave bereaved parents such as Ellen, Lisa, Esther, George, Mariano and sadly far too many more who have lost their children, but who will never give up the fight for everyone else’s. They are why I have not given up this fight, and it is for them that I have been fighting. I would not be able to look those brave parents in the eye if we allowed the Government to get away with a timeline that meant they did not even have to act in this Parliament. I welcome the Government’s constructive engagement on this issue, and we see a new proposal today that has a much more acceptable timeframe, albeit not as short as I would like. Every month of delay just leaves children more exposed to the harms of social media online. I urge the Minister to keep to her word today and ensure that action is as swift as possible.

    Hansard source
  35. ParliamentLaura Trott

    Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

    My right hon. Friend, as ever, is absolutely correct. As on the smartphone ban in schools, we have been fought every step of the way. I am just glad that right at the end of proceedings, we have managed to have a constructive discussion and to get to where we wanted to be right from the beginning.

    Hansard source
  36. ParliamentLaura Trott

    Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

    I would be incredibly concerned if that were the case. Would the Minister like to intervene and indicate whether any PPS sitting behind her was doing that? [Interruption.] She says no. Well, that is good to know. It would be incredibly concerning if that were the case.

    Hansard source
  37. ParliamentLaura Trott

    Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

    As ever, the hon. Gentleman is correct. I am sure that will be picked up by the Minister in her closing remarks.

    Hansard source
  38. ParliamentLaura Trott

    Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

    My right hon. Friend is always correct to be worried, but he will know that in Lord Nash’s amendment a 12-month delay was written in. I think it is reasonable to give the Government some time to bring the measure forward. As I said, the delay is not as short as I would like, but we have shown throughout the passage of the Bill—albeit a little too late, as I mentioned to the Minister—that we are able to compromise. I think we have shown good faith and I hope that is what the Government will now deliver on. Politics matters. It can make a difference. We have shown tonight that when we come together we can deliver in the interests of children.

    Hansard source
  39. ParliamentKatie Lam

    Dunmurry Police Station Attack

    We can all agree that the public should be protected from anybody who is willing to use violence against innocents and the police to get what they want, but I wonder how the right hon. Gentleman intends to enforce that. What message does he think it sends to those who have had the courage to protect the public, including British soldiers during the troubles, when this Government are making it easier for them to be dragged through the courts decades later?

    Hansard source
  40. ParliamentJoy Morrissey

    Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response Update

    I am just a humble Member of this House, and it is our job to hold the Government to account. It was unclear from the Minister’s first response what the process will be, so could he clarify again whether, if the ISC members disagree with the Government, that matter will be brought back to the House for a decision? I do not believe it is right for the Government to judge and mark their own homework.

    Hansard source